Smt Ifra And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 November, 2018·2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikas Kumar Seth vs Bank Of Baroda
Judges: Shashi Kant Gupta
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anandi Krishna Narayana, learned counsel for respondent bank. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-bank ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Reshami Pal And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 November, 2018·2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have solemnized th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramakant And Others vs State Of U P Adn Others
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anjani Kumar Mishra holding brief of Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for State respondents. By means of this wri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Shekhar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The petitioner may implead "Anil" as a respondent to the writ petition during the course of the day. The sole prayer of the petitioner is that the mutation Case No.2494 of 2017 (Computerised Case No.T- 2017143658022494) (Chandra Shekhar Vs. Ram Awadh) under sect...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak Ojha vs State Consumer Disputes
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. Heard Ms. Ruchi Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Against the award of compensation by the District Consumer Forum, the respondent nos.2 and 3 have filed two separate appeals before the State ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has come up with the grievance that upon certain complaint, a show cause notice was issued t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunari vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The sole prayer of the writ petitioner is that the Mutation Case No.519/ T20161506072697 of 2016 (Sunari vs. Rajesh) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 be decided within a stipulated period of time. It is, therefore, directed that the Mutation Case No.T201...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madan Pal And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
30 November, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39121 of 2018 Petitioner :- Madan Pal And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. The petitioners claim themselves to be landless labourers and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 November, 2018·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The grievance of the petitioner is that even while a partition suit was pending, the respondent no.7 was trying to get her share demarcated under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. He submits that unless and until the shares of co-sharers in the partition suit wer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.