Akhilesh Kumar Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. Shri Jay Ram Pandey appears for third respondent. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to fourth respondent. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shaheed Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vivek Kumar Birla
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. List of supplementary fresh cases has been revised. No one is present to press the present writ petition. Copy of the instructions filed today is taken on record. Present petition has been filed seeking direction the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner in regular...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Bahadur vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to fifth respondent. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to second respondent i.e. Registrar/ Inspector Arbi, Fars...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shobh Nath Ram vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vivek Kumar Birla
30 March, 2018·Present petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to deduct the necessary amount from the salary of petitioner under the provisions of contributory pension scheme. ii) issue a writ, orde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not go to respondent nos.4 and 5. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to third respondent i.e. District Inspector ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Petitioner is aggrieved by an order, which requires the petitioner to vacate the premises allotted to him earlier. Application of the petitioner to continue on the ground that his son is studying in Class XI has been rejected. Admittedly petitioner was transferred in ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
C/M Ramnath Pathak Inter College Murarpatti And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9063 of 2018 Petitioner :- C/M Ramnath Pathak Inter College Murarpatti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gautam Baghel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. By means of this writ petition, the petitione...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sandhya Devi And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Shri A.B. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for all the respondents. The petitioners are before this Court with request to issue direction to the third respondent, Deputy Director of Sanskrit, U.P....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vachaspati Pandey vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 March, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9037 of 2018 Petitioner :- Vachaspati Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 02 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to second respondent i.e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Kumar vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
30 March, 2018·Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Petitioner is aggrieved by a censure entry awarded to him, against which an appeal has also been rejected. Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner has a remedy of filing a revision under Rule 23 of the Rules of 1991, which has not been availed. Since the peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.