Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vipin Kumar vs State Of Up And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9060 of 2018 Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Arshad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Petitioner is aggrieved by a censure entry awarded to him, against which an appeal has also been rejected.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner has a remedy of filing a revision under Rule 23 of the Rules of 1991, which has not been availed.
Since the petitioner has not exhausted the alternative remedy available, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition.
Leaving it open for the petitioner to pursue the remedy, as may be available to him in law, this writ petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 30.3.2018 Anil
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vipin Kumar vs State Of Up And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Mohammad Arshad Khan