Special vs Bhimsang
Judges:
28 March, 2012·The present civil application has been filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the First Appeal under sec. 5 of the Limitation Act on the grounds stated in the application inter alia procedural delay in getting necessary approval/sanction after completing the formalities.Heard learned AGP Mr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs Daulatrai
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Learned counsel, Ms.R.V. Acharya has placed on record a communication dated 17.02.2012 pursuant to the earlier order dated 05.03.2012, which reveals that the premises in question has been vacated since 29.05.2005 and the possession has been handed over to the respondent, Daulatrai Chhotubhai Desai.I...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs Ghani
Judges:
28 March, 2012·1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant-original appellant-original plaintiff to permit it to join the subsequent purchasers of the disputed property in question i.e. the persons whose names have been mentioned in paragraph 4 of the present application as respondents nos. 7 an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gsrtc vs Naynaben
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Mrs.Falguni Patel learned counsel for appellant submitted that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court and therefore, the present appeal may be disposed of. She has supplied the communication dated 09.03.2012 which shows the terms of settlement. In view of the abo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Ms.D.S.Pandit
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Learned Advocate for the petitioner makes a grievance that even if a bus is overloaded by a few passengers, then also the R.T.O. Officers are detaining the bus for a long time. She further states that at night time, the passengers are put to harassment if the bus is detained for a long time. She als...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abhishek vs Archanaben
Judges:
28 March, 2012·The remark in the cause list reveals that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 could not be served, as having not been found at given address.Mr.A.P.Patel, learned advocate for the applicant states that on the next date, he shall provide fresh address of the unserved respondents.It may be noted that the inst...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Jiviben
Judges:
28 March, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the present appellant-original opponent No.2 has challenged the judgement and award dated 01.01.2005, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Modasa, in M.A.C.P. No. 96 of 1993, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.2,69,000/- to the claimants...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs The Petitioner Is An Engineer
Judges:
28 March, 2012·The petitioner is an engineer, who desires to prosecute his studies in the field of information technology and therefore he applied for admission to Post-Graduate Diploma in Information Technology course conducted by the respondent Institute. For the purpose of getting admission to the said course, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Palco vs Asst.Provident
Judges:
28 March, 2012·When the application is called out, learned advocate for the petitioner has requested for time on the ground that the senior counsel appearing with him is not available.Mr.Rao, learned advocate for the respondent - PF Authority has appeared and submitted that the PF Authority intends to take action ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vodafone vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Notice returnable on 30th March 2012.After hearing Mr.Panchal, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and after going through the materials on record, we find that the petitioner has made out a strong prima facie cas...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.