Gaddam Venkatamma vs The A P Central Power Distribution Company Ltd
Judges: R Kantha Rao
18 October, 2014·WRIT PETITION No.1267 of 2014 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not sanctioning and paying the family pension to the petitioner and the action of the second respondent i...
High Court Of Telangana
Indus Ind Bank Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Police
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
18 October, 2014·…..Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21057 OF 2009 ORDER: This Writ Petition was filed challenging the action of the respondents in interfering with possession and plying of vehicle bearing No. AP 31 X 8249 owned by the second petitioner. This Court by order...
High Court Of Telangana
G Nandi Reddy And vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: R Kantha Rao
18 October, 2014·ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 6th respondent in issuing the impugned orders in Rc.No.B1/2442/KGBVs/2013, dated 17.04.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Government Order...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sree Radha Krishna Alloys Pvt Ltd vs Southern Power Distribution Company Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
18 October, 2014·ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in disconnecting power supply of the petitioner’s service connection bearing No.ATP-317 for non-payment of FSA charges for the months of February and March, 2012 as illegal and arbitrary. On 17.10.2014, Sri O....
High Court Of Telangana
Masihullah Sharifi And vs The State Of Telangana
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
18 October, 2014·Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M.Satish Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Education The Court made the following: ORDER: .. Respondents This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in detaining the petitioners in B.E III year (Semester I), on the groun...
High Court Of Telangana
Pilla Veera Bhaskar vs The Govt Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
18 October, 2014·…Petitioner …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.VVN.Narayana Rao Counsel for the respondents: --- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamu...
High Court Of Telangana
Aruru Ramanaiah vs The Govt Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
18 October, 2014·…Petitioner …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.Y.Ramatirtha Counsel for the respondents: GP for Irrigation and CAD The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.3 has not been considering the petitioner’s representation for protectin...
High Court Of Telangana
L Naga Subba Reddy vs The Govt Of A P
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
18 October, 2014·…Petitioner …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.N.Ranga Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP) The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the proceeding in Ref.B/5344/2014, dated 25-09-2014, issued by respondent No....
High Court Of Telangana
Smt P Lakshmi vs The Govt Of A P
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
18 October, 2014·…Petitioner …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.N.Ranga Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP) The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing the proceeding in Roc.B/8112/2014,...
High Court Of Telangana
R Satyavathi And Another vs The Union Of India
Judges: R Kantha Rao
18 October, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.30465 of 2014 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. A short prayer made by the petitioner is that the representation made by the 1st petitioner dated 08.09.2014 for a...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.