Smt Laxmi Chauhan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Learned Standing Counsel is present. None present on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition against the order of transfer dated 30.06.2007. When the matter was taken up as fresh, it was pointed out before the Court that this is secon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Kumar Tiwari vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Learned Standing Counsel is present. None present on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present writ prayer for quashing the order of suspension dated 17.03.2006 as well as order of transfer dated 15.07.2006. At the time when the writ petition was fil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Learned Standing Counsel is present. None present on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition challenging the order of suspension dated 04.11.2006. An interim order has been granted in favour of the petitioner on 22.12.2006, til...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aradhana Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to issue a mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to work on the post of Shiksha Mitra in Basic Primary School Bheera, Block Badraon, District Mau. No interim order has bee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pancham Ram vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard Sri Anand Yadav, learned counsel, holding brief of Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred the present petition against the order of recovery dated 02.05.2006. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagat Narayan Gupta vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Grievance of the petitioner is that the contesting respondent is illegally trying to construct a temple over Plot No. 306 which is Bhoomidhari land of the petitioner, as it is evident fr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Maruti Heavy Engineering vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
23 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34330 of 2021 Petitioner :- M/S Maruti Heavy Engineering Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Awtar Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Kumar Rai Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. Petitioner is aggrieved by cancellation...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nand Lal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34348 of 2021 Petitioner :- Nand Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suneel Kumar Mishra,Pramod Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the instant wr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Shahjade vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Grievance of the petitioner is that the order passed in demarcation proceedings dated 6.9.2021 was not being implemented. In this regard, the petitioner has also moved an application on 5.12.2021 before the respondent n o. 2, the Sub Divisional officer, Teh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amarawati Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 December, 2021·Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition has been filed beseeching expeditious disposal of Case No. T 202105440200513 (Amarawati vs. Mahendra and others), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pend...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.