Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pancham Ram vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32407 of 2006 Petitioner :- Pancham Ram Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nisheeth Yadav
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Anand Yadav, learned counsel, holding brief of Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
The petitioner has preferred the present petition against the order of recovery dated 02.05.2006.
Today, when the matter is taken up, it has informed by Sri Anand Yadav, learned counsel, holding brief of Sri Nitesh Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents that the amount in question has already been deposited by the petitioner.
In this view of the matter, the Court is of the opinion that no further order is required to be passed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 VKG
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pancham Ram vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 December, 2021
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Vinod Kumar