Manoj Kumar Yadav vs Manish Kumar Nahar Holding Post Of ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
30 August, 2019·2. It was alleged in the writ petition that the petitioner's land was acquired and award was passed on 22.01.2015. It was alleged that 100 per cent solatium was not awarded to the petitioner and he was entitled to 100 per cent solatium. It was further said that the Government Order dated 15.02.2017 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Praveen Kumar Dwivedi vs Budh Priy Singh,Basic Shiksha ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
30 August, 2019·Urge made on behalf of the petitioner is confined to the extent that the petitioner was appointed as assistant teacher in the primary school, Pipri Aziz Block Pasgawan, District Lakhimpur Khiri on the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800, Grade Pay 4200, as such he is teaching. The petitioner had earlier file...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shareef Ahmad & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Secretary ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba, Manish Mathur
30 August, 2019·(Oral) 1. This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents not to demolish the residential houses of the petitioners without adopting due process of law. 2. We find from the pleadings and it is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that civil suit has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ranjeet Gautam @ Suraj vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 August, 2019·Heard Sri Ram Sajiwan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, as well as learned Government Advocate. This petition has been filed for quashing the First Information Report in Case Crime no.0651/2019, under Sections 363, 366, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Madiaon, District- Luckn...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadhu Sharan vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
30 August, 2019·In this public interest litigation, a pray has been made by the writ petitioner to restrain the respondent No.7 from running brick kiln, which is situated at Village Ithua Sunderpur, Pargana Bidahar, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar. By way of supplementary affidavit dated 04.07.2019, learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Mala Singh vs Naib Tehsildar Patti Pratapgarh & ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
30 August, 2019·The present wit petition has been filed for issuance of a direction to the opposite party no.1 i.e. Naib Tehsildar, Magraura, Tehsil-Patti, District-Pratapgarh to decide the application for mutation of the petitioner registered as Case Crime No.407 of 2019 (Smt. Mala Singh Vs. Lal Pratap Singh), Com...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babulal @ Babu vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
30 August, 2019·This writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), District Barabanki to hear and decide the Case No. 11918 of 2018, Bhullan and another Vs. Babu Lal as expeditiously as possible. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the afor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra Singh vs Manoj Singh,Prin.Secy.Samaj ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
30 August, 2019·Sri D.C.Pathak, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the competent authority that in case the facts as sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jay Prakash vs The Chief Revenue Officer ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
30 August, 2019·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the opposite party No.1 to decide the Case No. 182, said to be pending before him since 2015 as expeditiously as possible. It has been submitted that the respondents in the aforesaid case have already filed their objectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
30 August, 2019·The brief facts of the case are that an advertisement dated 10.09.2010 was issued by the respondent no.2 for filling up the 13 posts X-Ray Technician, thereafter on 23.02.2011 again an advertisement was published for filling up 102 posts of X-Ray Technician. Pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.