Mohd Harun And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
23 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners claim that they were appointed as Assistant Teachers in the institution run by respondent no.5, Madarsa Qurania, Zama Maszid, Jaunpur. It is stated that the institution in question is a recognized institution. The institution has advertised the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
C/M Janta Kanya Pathshala Junior High School Dist Hapur Through Its Manager Ishwar Chand Bansal vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary Basic Education Govt Of U P Lucknow And Another
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
23 February, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In pith and substance, the petitioner-Committee of Management Janta Kanya Pathshala Junior High School Dist. Hapur is before this Court asking that its representation/communication dated 27.01.2018, addressed to the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brajesh Kumar Singh vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
23 February, 2018·Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendra Nath Singh,Satish Kumar Dwivedi,Shivendra Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Chaturvedi Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Sanjay...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Paras Nath Gupta And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
23 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for parties. Learned counsel for the parties contend that the primary issue which falls for consideration was engaging the attention of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 9165-9172 of 2010 (Sunil Kumar Verma and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others) and other connected matte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
23 February, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Shri Adarsh Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for all the respondents. Ashok Kumar and Suresh Chandra are before this Court with request to issue direction to the first respondent i.e. Special Secretary...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar vs State Of U P Through Principal Secretary
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
23 February, 2018·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of transfer dated 4.8.2017. The petitioner was transferred from Gautam Budh Nagar to Ka...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Chandra Mishra vs State Of U P And Ors
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
23 February, 2018·Counsel for Petitioner :- Amrendra Pratap Singh,Subhendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Heard Shri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vikram Bahadur Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. The writ petition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Shiromani Yadav vs State Of Up Through Principal
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
23 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6530 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Shiromani Yadav Respondent :- State Of Up Through Principal,Secretary Home U.P,Shasan,At Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sohan Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Against the order of censor entry...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Dham Tiwari vs State Of Up And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
23 February, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Anshu Chaudhary for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for State and Sri Rajiv Sharma for respondent-2. The writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent-2 to release final pension of the petitioner and other post retiral dues. It has be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U P Through Dm
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
23 February, 2018·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar for the petitioner , Standing Counsel for State and Sri S.M. Shukla for respondents- 2 to 4. The writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing Executive Officer, respondent-3 to decide the representations of the petitioner dated 17.1.201...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.