Sri Pathallapalli Sivarama Raju vs The Town Planning Officer And Others
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·RESPONDENTS ORDER: Since the learned counsel for the petitioners expired, Registry was directed to issue notice to the petitioners. The notice sent to the 1st petitioner was served and the 2nd petitioner refused to receive the same. Today, when the case is called none appears for the petitioners and...
High Court Of Telangana
Sree Rushi Vidyalay And Others vs The Transport Commissioner And Others
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·PETITIONERS AND 1. The Transport Commissioner, A.P., Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: It is represented by Sri P. Venkata Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording th...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohd Khaja Pasha And Others vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·PETITIONERS AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: When the case was called on 07.11.2014 learned counsel for the petitioners was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be posted today. Even today, when the case is...
High Court Of Telangana
Jogi Ankaiah And Anr vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·…Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 27635 OF 2007 ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioners was absent on 21.11.2014. Even today also, none appeared for the petitioners. However, learned Government Pleader submits that since the matter relates to el...
High Court Of Telangana
Sri Meenakshi Junior College vs The Government Of Ap
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 10400 OF 2007 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents. This Writ Petition was filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 13.02.2007 as contrary to G.O.Ms.No...
High Court Of Telangana
Bvc Engineering College vs The Transport Commissioner
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·…Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 12456 OF 2007 ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration ...
High Court Of Telangana
Kolipaka Odelu vs Kakatiya University
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·RESPONDENT ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-University. This writ petition was filed challenging the inaction on the part of the respondent in not considering the representation dated 08.06.2007, as illegal and arbitrary. In the said rep...
High Court Of Telangana
D Keerhi vs The Convenor
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 14625 OF 2002 ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 26.11.2014, none appeared for the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be listed for today under the caption ‘For Orders’. Even to day also, though the matter is...
High Court Of Telangana
Shaik Abdullah vs The Chairman And Managing Director
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
28 November, 2014·Shaik Abdullah … Petitioner and 1. The Chairman and Managing Director, Air India Limited (Erstwhile Indian Air Lines), New Delhi & 2 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.9481 of 2012 O R D E R: It is fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the ...
High Court Of Telangana
G Kamala Prasad vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
28 November, 2014·RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home. This writ petition was filed challenging the action of the respondents in providing security to the 5th respondent as illegal and being contrary to G.O.Rt.No.655, dated 13.03.1997 and consequently to...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.