P Mohammed vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: K G Shankar
22 April, 2014·2 Y.Mahboob Basha S/o. Sattar, . Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rept. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP., Hyderabad. . Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds fil...
High Court Of Telangana
K S Jagadeesh vs S Syed And Another
Judges: B Chandra Kumar M
22 April, 2014·3. The brief facts of the case are as follows: On 26.02.2002 at about 9.30 a.m., while the claimant was proceeding from his house to I.T.I. Chittoor on his cycle and reached I.T.I. main gate, a lorry bearing No. AAC 5330 came from behind at a high speed in a rash and negligent manner and dashed agai...
High Court Of Telangana
Md Moti Shaik vs State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
22 April, 2014·ORDER: “The petitioner is A-2. He seeks for grant of bail. He allegedly committed offences under Sections 489-B and 489-C IPC. In all four counterfeit currency notes of Rs. 1,000/- denomination were found in the possession of the petitioner. In view of the quantity of the contraband seize...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohd Majid vs The State Of A P
Judges:
22 April, 2014·THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER “The petitioner seeks for grant of anticipatory bail. He allegedly committed offences under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 and 506 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the de- facto complainant and the petitioner are brothers and owing to the differ...
High Court Of Telangana
Yerukali Raju vs The State Of Ap
Judges: K G Shankar
22 April, 2014·The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the father of the petitioner is seriously ill and the presence of the petitioner is required to take care of his father. The petitioner, who is A1 in SC No. 472 of 2012 is undergoing trial in the case. It would appear that the petitioner jumped b...
High Court Of Telangana
Deekonda Nagaiah And Another vs M/S Laul Transport Corporation And Another
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
22 April, 2014·Challenging the award dated 06.12.2004 in O.P.No.2412 of 2001 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts (Fast Track Court), at Hyderabad (for short “the Tribunal”), the claimants preferred the instant appeal. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The c...
High Court Of Telangana
Tulsi Laxmi Narayana @ Raju vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: K G Shankar
22 April, 2014·. Respondent/Complainant. Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of CR.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioner/A-4 on bail in connection with Crime No. 156 of 2013 pending on the file of the SHO, ...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt K Jayasree & Others vs K Shankara Reddy And Others
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
22 April, 2014·f) A perusal of the award would show that issue No.1 is concerned, the Tribunal relying upon the evidence of PW2—eye witness coupled with Ex.A1—F.I.R, Ex.A.2—alteration memo and Ex.A4—charge sheet, held that the driver of the offending bus was responsible for the accident. Issue No.2 which relates ...
High Court Of Telangana
Santhosh Rajbhar @ Jugesh And Others vs The State Of A P
Judges:
22 April, 2014·Respondent/Respondent COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS : Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Public Prosecutor Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to relax/modify the c...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt K Jayasree & Others vs K Shankara Reddy And Others
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
22 April, 2014·f) A perusal of the award would show that issue No.1 is concerned, the Tribunal relying upon the evidence of PW2—eye witness coupled with Ex.A1—F.I.R, Ex.A.2—alteration memo and Ex.A4—charge sheet, held that the driver of the offending bus was responsible for the accident. Issue No.2 which relates ...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.