Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Santhosh Rajbhar @ Jugesh And Others vs The State Of A P

High Court Of Telangana|22 April, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE: K. G. SHANKAR CRL.P. No. 4351 of 2014 Between:
1. Santhosh Rajbhar @ Jugesh S/o Harihar Rajbhar (A-4)
2. Jalander Chowhan S/o Devnath Chowhan (A-6)
3. Subhash Rajbar S/o Poolbadhan (A-7) Petitioners (Petitioners in Cr. No.251 of 2013 on the file of P.S. Narsingi, R.R. District. ) AND The State of A.P., through SHO, P.S. Narsingi, Ranga Reddy District, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
Respondent/Respondent COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS : Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Public Prosecutor Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to relax/modify the condition of executing personal bond each of the petitioner for Rs. 10,000/- with two local sureties each, having immovable properties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar, imposed in Crl.MP. No. 616 of 2014 by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad dated 19.3.2014 in Crime No. 251 of 2013 of P.S. Narsingi, Ranga Reddy District in P.R.C. No. 125 of 2013 on the file of the VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER “The petitioners were enlarged on bail by the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar. While granting bail, a condition was imposed that the petitioners shall produce two local sureties, having immovable property to the satisfaction of the VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners being non-residents of Andhra Pradesh are not able to furnish local sureties having immovable property and that they are ready to deposit cash security with personal bond. To safeguard the interest of the prosecution, I consider it appropriate to direct the petitioners to deposit the money as offered by the petitioners and also direct them to appear before the police station every day.
(Contd. 2. ) . 2 .
Consequently, criminal petition is allowed and the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Sessions J u d g e , Cyberabad is modified directing that the petitioners shall deposit Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each towards bond amount as offered by them together with personal bond for Rs.10,000/- each. After their release, they shall appear on every day between 9 and 6 p.m. before the S.H.O., Rayadurgam Police station, Ranga Reddy district.”
//TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.
2. The VIII Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar.
3. The Station House Officer, Narsingi Police Station, R.R. District.
4. The Station House Officer, Rayadurgam Police Station, R.R. District.
5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
6. One CC to Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
7. One Spare copy BV HIGH COURT DR. KGS.J DATED: 22-04-2014 ORDER CRL.P.NO.4351 OF 2014 DIRECTION DRAFTED: BY BV DATED : 23-04-2014 HIGH COURT DR. KGS.J DATED: 22-04-2014 ORDER CRL.P.NO.4351 OF 2014 DIRECTION
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Santhosh Rajbhar @ Jugesh And Others vs The State Of A P

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
22 April, 2014
Advocates
  • Sri M Ram Mohan Reddy