Saritha.V Viswanathan vs State Of Kerala
Judges: C K Abdul Rehim
09 October, 2014·The petitioner was appointed as Upper Primary School Assistant (UPSA) in the 5th respondent's school with effect from 21.6.2004, against a leave vacancy which arose consequent to leave availed by one Smt. P.Sobha, who was working as a UPSA. Originally the leave applied by Smt. P.Sobha was up to 31...
High Court Of Kerala
Bhaskaran
Judges: V Chitambaresh
09 October, 2014·It is trite law that a re-hearing cannot be attempted in the guise of a review. This is what is attempted by the review petitioners in the instant case. New documents are pressed into service along with the petitions for review. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the recor...
High Court Of Kerala
Chakeeri Premarajan
Judges: V Chitambaresh
09 October, 2014·The courts below have concurrently decreed the suit for recovery of possession on title. It has been uniformly found that the plaintiff has title over a narrow strip of land after acquisition of the remaining portion. The identification is on the basis of commission reports and plans based on survey...
High Court Of Kerala
Joy
Judges: V Chitambaresh
09 October, 2014·The first respondent enters appearance. The second respondent is deleted from the party array. This is on the oral request of the appellants.2. The dispute is settled between the parties. A compromise petition is also filed. The Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the com...
High Court Of Kerala
Emmanuel
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
09 October, 2014·The petitioners are rival operators of the 2nd respondent, the latter of whom, had been granted a regular permit by the 1st respondent. The petitioners' only prayer is that their objections, Ext.P5 may be considered before a timing conference is convened. 2.In the circumstances, there shall be a di...
High Court Of Kerala
E.T.Pathrose
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
09 October, 2014·The petitioner has approached the 1st respondent for the cancellation of Torrance sketch and plan prepared under the Surveys and Boundaries Act by the 2nd respondent. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P1 complaint before the 1st respondent. It seems that on account of the pendency of civil suit between...
High Court Of Kerala
Vanchiyoor
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
09 October, 2014·The petitioner is a society who is aggrieved with Ext.P6 order passed by the Joint Registrar, on an objection by the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent, admittedly is an employee who was dismissed from the service of the 1st respondent. The appeal against the dismissal, filed before the P...
High Court Of Kerala
M.P.Jayaprakash
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
09 October, 2014·The petitioners raised a complaint before the District Collector, Alappuzha regarding the construction of Arakkathara- Velathikara - Nalupara road in Ward No.7 of Neelamperoor Grama Panchayath. The petitioners claim to be the resident of Neelamperoor Grama Panchayath. According to t...
High Court Of Kerala
Sunny Joseph @ Ephrem Joseph
Judges: K Surendra Mohan
09 October, 2014·The petitioner is the owner in possession of an item of immovable property within the first respondent Municipality. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Exhibit P6 proceedings by which, the first respondent has rejected an application for a modified permi...
High Court Of Kerala
George vs Kodakara Grama Panchayath
Judges: K Surendra Mohan
09 October, 2014·The petitioners have filed this Writ Petition challenging Ext.P6 proceedings of the second respondent rejecting their application for permission to construct a commercial building in their property. Their application have been rejected for the reason that the property is described as 'nilam' in the ...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.