Sangita Gupta vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. The present petition has been filed by the informant seeking direction to the respondents no. 2 to conduct fair investigation pursuant to the first informat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Tripathi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 31851 of 2018 Petitioner :- Arun Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Chandra vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
29 November, 2019·Heard Sri Arun Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gauri Shankar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and the learned A.G.A. for the State. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the FIR dated 27.08.2019 registered as Case Crime No....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kajal And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
29 November, 2019·This writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the first information report dated16.11.2019 as Case Crime No.381 of 2019, under Section 366 I.P.C., Police Station Syana, District Bulandshahar. The first information report has been lodged by the respondent no.3, who is the father of the petiti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faraman Khan vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
29 November, 2019·Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 32188 of 2018 Petitioner :- Faraman Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar Panchal vs S Judge And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J. None is present in the revised list from the side of revisionist to press this revision. Learned A.G.A. is present. The revision is pertaining to the year 1992 and till date, it is still awaiting admission. This criminal revision has been filed against the judgmen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajmani And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "(A) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no. 2 i.e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikram And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Mahesh Narain Singh for the Gaon Sabha as also learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents. It appears that the petitioner filed a suit for declaration in the year 2008. In this suit, a stay application has been...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Shanti Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Manoj Kumar Gupta
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Prayer made in the instant petition is as follows :- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to restore the boundary and its pillars of Arazi no. 279 Ka area 0.318 hectare Village Paklore Tehsil Handila, District Alla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girraj vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
29 November, 2019·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 and 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondents no.3 to 6. During the course of arguments petitioner has confined his prayer only in respe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.