Awadh Bihari Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secretary ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
30 August, 2019·Heard Sri Vijay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Q.H. Rizvi, learned Standing Counsel for respondents. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to challenge the demand of motor tax issue...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarla Yadav Thru. Her Husband ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
30 August, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Murtaza Ali Khan who earlier filed this petition is not present in whose presence the statement of the corpus having been produced before this Court got recorded in order dated 26.8.2019. According to the statement of the corpus, Ms. Sarla Yadav has got marrie...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj & Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 August, 2019·This petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to create unnecessary hindrance in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners and not to disturb their mental peace and personal life and liberty. It has been alleged that both the petitioners are major and have mar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Chanda Verma @ Dinesh ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rekha Dikshit
30 August, 2019·Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the petition. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not to be exercised in a routine manner, but it is for limited purposes, namely, to give effect to any order under the Code, or to prevent abuse of process of any Court or otherwise to secure ends...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sadhvi Rangitamani vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
30 August, 2019·In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party No. 3 is dispense with. Facts, in brief, of the present case are to the effect that the petitioner moved an application dated 16.12.2017 under Section 40 of the Registration Act registered as Case No. 1/2018 before the opposite par...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Spl. Secy. ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
30 August, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that against the order dated 30.3.2019, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the writ petition, the petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 4.4.2019 to the respondent No.5, a copy of which is Annexure-6 to the writ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar vs Naib Tehsildar Teh Haidergarh ...
Judges: Rajan Roy
30 August, 2019·That is why this court had passed the aforesaid orders and in pursuance of orders passed in some cases the bar associations responded with responsibility and sincerity by resuming work. Some of the bar associations even passed resolution not to abstain from work. However, it seems that in some of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jageshwar Dayal And Others vs Rajjan Lal
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
30 August, 2019·17. The learned appellate court thus concurred with the learned trial court, that no objection had been tendered by the plaintiffs-appellants to the compromise. In its narration of facts, though, the appellate court noticed the objection made by the plaintiffs-appellants before the trial court seeki...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhirendra Dutt Singh vs Senior Superintendent Of Police ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 August, 2019·"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the Station House Officer, Husainganj, District Lucknow to ensure the compliance of order dated 7.12.2018, passed by the Additional Civil Judge (J.D), Court No.36, Lucknow in complaint case no.1359/2016 (Dhirendra Dut...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bindhesh Pandey vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
30 August, 2019·From perusal of the record, it is clear that there is no substantial compliance of the provisions under Chapter XXII Rule 3-A of the Allahabad High Court Rules; inasmuch as only in paragraph 4, briefly, it has been mentioned that the petitioner is a practicing Advocate and keenly interested in maint...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.