Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mr Gn Shah For
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Mr.Mehta, after arguing this matter for some time, has requested the Court to allow him to withdraw the petition, since the petitioner would like to make a representation, as according to him, unfortunately, no reply was filed to the show cause notice issued to him by the respondent Corporation. Mr....
High Court Of Gujarat
Ilaben vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, so also considering the papers annexed with this application and the order passed in this matter on 27.9.2010, this Court is of the opinion that important question of law appears to have involved in this matter and the detailed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dipika vs U.N.Mehta
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Without prejudice to the rights and contentions raised in the petition, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file fresh petition at later stage, if reason and ground for challenging the order namely payment of salary or substance allowance survive. Request for permission t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ripalben vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·By way of these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 31.12.2011 where under the Talati-Cum-Mantri passed orders declining the prayers made in the application for change in the birth certificate.Prima facie it appeared that it was contrary to the provision of Section 15 of the R...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jitendra vs Shailesh
Judges:
28 March, 2012·At the joint request made by learned advocate Mr. Amit Thakkar as well as learned advocate Mr. Jigar Patel with learned Sr. Counsel Mr. D.C. Dave the matter is adjourned to 12.4.2012 to enable them to make efforts for settlement.(Rajesh H. Shukla, J.) (hn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jindal vs Union
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Notice returnable on 11th April 2012. Direct service to respondent nos.2 and 3 is permitted.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala, J.) /moin Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
First Appeal No. 2279 Of 2 vs Mr Mehul S Shah For Petitioner No. ...
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI)1.Heard Mr. Mehul S. Shah learned counsel for the appellant.2.This appeal is directed against the judgement and award passed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act in M.A.C.Petition No.865 of 1999 by the M.A.C.Tribunal (Main), Kuttch at Bhuj, whereby the Tribunal ha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Mr B.G. Jani For Opponents No. 1 To 3
Judges:
28 March, 2012·[ Per: N.G. Nandi, J. ] Heard Mr. K.K.Nair, learned Advocate for the applicant and Mr. B.G. Jani, learned Advocate for Opponents No. 1 to 3. Opponents No. 4 to 6 served.It is stated by Mr. K.K. Nair, learned Advocate for the appellant/applicant Insurance Company that the entire awarded amount togeth...
High Court Of Gujarat
Misc.Civil Application No. 624 Of ... vs Notice Not Recd Back For
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI)1.It is stated by Ms. Manisha Lavkumar learned AGP for State of Gujarat that there is no objection in permitting the applicants to file the Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act as an indigent person. Ms. Rupal Patel learned counsel on 14.3.2002 accepted the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Misc.Application No. ... vs Mr V M Pancholi
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Rule. Mr V M Pancholi, learned APP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent State of Gujarat. By consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, this matter is being heard and disposed of finally. 2.It appears from the FIR at page 31 that the present petitioner was driving a two wh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.