Chetanbhai vs Deputy
Judges:
13 March, 2012·Draft amendment is granted.S.O.to 22.03.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ratilal vs Notice Unserved For
Judges:
13 March, 2012·In view of the endorsement, fresh notice is ordered to be issued returnable on 26th March 2012. Direct service is permitted.[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baka vs The
Judges:
13 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule.By this application, the applicant - convict has prayed that he be enlarged on temporary bail on the ground that he wants to make necessary arrangement for mutation of the ancestral property.In...
High Court Of Gujarat
Singh vs State
Judges:
13 March, 2012·It appears prima facie that the Government Resolution on which reliance is placed by the respondent No.2, does not admit an inference that the waiting list cannot be operated in respect of department other than the two Departments mentioned therein. Besides this, it is also not clear from the affida...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Memunaben
Judges:
13 March, 2012·Heard. Stay against execution of the impugned award on condition that the applicants deposit with the Reference Court the entire decretal amount within a period of six weeks from today. The original claimant/s shall be permitted to withdraw 50% of the invested amount subject to the result of the fir...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pravinsinh vs Unknown
Judges:
13 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. Learned Counsel for the applicant pointed out that the award of the Labour Court in favour of the applicant-employee was challenged before this Court and the learned Single Judge, while disposing of Special Civil Application No.8166 of 2003, by an order d...
High Court Of Gujarat
Salmaben vs State
Judges:
13 March, 2012·BELOW SPEAKING TO MINUTES By way of present Speaking to Minute, the applicant has prayed for correction in the year, i.e. from January, 2012 to January, 2011, from which the respondent No.2-husband is directed to pay Rs.2,800/-per month to the applicant instead of Rs.1,350/- per month towards mainte...
High Court Of Gujarat
Smt vs The
Judges:
13 March, 2012·Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?NO 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?NO 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?NO 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of Indi...
High Court Of Gujarat
S.M vs State
Judges:
13 March, 2012·Mr.Trivedi, learned Advocate has submitted that now he is instructed to appear, as advocate for petitioner, instead of Mr.Deepak Sanchela, learned Advocate (on behalf of the petitioner). He, however, clarified that until now he has not entered his appearance and has not filed his Vakalatnama. He, re...
High Court Of Gujarat
Atulbhai vs Rajubhai
Judges:
13 March, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. HG Patel for the applicant states that the parties have settled. Therefore, he has instruction to withdraw this application. He seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission as prayed for is granted. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.