Special Civil Application No. ... vs Notice Served By Ds For
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Mr.Kakkad wants to delete respondent nos.5, 6 and7. Permission is granted. Mr.Kakkad also wants to join Patni Husain Sidi as respondent No.5 in the main petition. Fresh notice to the respondents, including the newly added respondent No.5, returnable on 14.10.2002. Ad-interim relief granted earlier t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs By Our Order
Judges:
30 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By our order dated March 16, 2012, we issued notice upon the respondents making it returnable on April 13, 2012. Further, being prima facie satisfied with the case made out by the petitioners, we also granted interim stay of operati...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sadhu vs Rajkot
Judges:
30 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the materials on record, we find that during pendency of the Special Civil Application, the petitioner has already paid the principal amount of dues. Now the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
S vs State
Judges:
30 March, 2012·The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief:-"34[A] Your Lordships may be pleased to fix the early date for final hearing of the main petition being Special Civil Application No.11196 of 2006 in the interest of justice."2. Having regard to the fact that senior and ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kutch vs State
Judges:
30 March, 2012·1. Rule.Ms.Vinita Vinayak, learned counsel appearing for M/s. Thakkar Associates waives service of Rule for the respondent.2. Considering the prayers prayed for in the application and with consent of the respective learned counsel, the application is taken up for final hearing forthwith.3. Consideri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indresh vs Unknown
Judges:
30 March, 2012·1. Today when the present Civil Revision Application is taken up for final hearing, learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties, under the instructions from their respective clients, have jointly stated at the bar that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and, therefore,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Fortis vs Gsl(India)
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Considering the office note dated 29.3.2012 as well as the communication dated 29.3.2012 addressed by learned advocate Mr. Ashok C. Gandhi, it appears that learned advocate Mr. A.C. Gandhi has expressed his desire to retire from the matter. Hence, fresh NOTICE to the respondent returnable on 25.4.20...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bank vs Official
Judges:
30 March, 2012·By an order dated 30.3.2012, this Court had ordered fresh notice to unserved respondent Nos.4, 6 and 9. Mr. Rao, learned advocate for the applicant shall give fresh address. The applicant is permitted to amend the cause title of the application by showing correct address. Direct service is permitted...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sugnaben vs United
Judges:
30 March, 2012·In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 5(A) and (B. The application stands disposed of accordingly.The main appeal is fixed for final hearing on 23rd April, 2012.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
First Appeal No. 992 Of 2002 vs Notice Served For
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS) Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 shall file an affidavit stating the present status of Respondent No.1, her address and whereabouts and also as to whether his client has received any amount by way of interim compensation, on the next date of hearing. Put up on 2n...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.