Whether vs Nand
Judges:
22 June, 2012·1.0. Admit.The following substantial question of law arises in the present Second Appeal."Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case when the learned trial Court found that the order of dismissal was in breach of principles of natural justice as the departmental inquiry was in violation of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raghuvirsinh vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Notice returnable on 20.07.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Divya// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Mahendrakumar
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Rule returnable on 27.7.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nanaubhai vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·It appears that at the time of initial/admission hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment in the case of Baldevbhai Ambalal Patni v. State of Gujarat and Ors. [(1996) G.L.H. 1082]. However, it appears that while relying on the said judgment at the time of admission hearing ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sukhiben vs Gujarat
Judges:
22 June, 2012·(1) The present Civil application No. 6750 of 2012 is filed for condonation of delay of 54 days in filing the Misc. Civil Application for restoration of the First Appeal No. 1965 of 1999 by the applicants-original appellants.(2) Heard Mr. K.V.Shelat, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Roopal ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maheshkumar vs Jogeshkumar
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Patel under instruction of the respondent Jogeshkumar Krishnakumar Raval, who is present before this Court requests for time to pay some amount pursuant to undertaking given before this Court. He states that within three weeks, respondent shall deposit Rs. 1,50,000/- in this Cou...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rahimali vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·1.0 This application has been filed by the applicant for directing the respondents to release the retiral benefits like provident fund, gratuity, group insurance, etc. with immediate effect in the interest of justice.2.0 Learned advocate of the applicant states that provisional pension is paid to th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Satishkumar vs Maharaja
Judges:
22 June, 2012·By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners have prayed for a direction to the respondent to release the increments for the period from 1996 to 2000. In view of the settled legal position of law that an employee cannot, as a matter of right, claim the benefit of advance increment.Therefore, th...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Punjaji
Judges:
22 June, 2012·It has been the consistent practice of this Court not to enter into the merits of those appeal wherein the claim is petty, and claims upto Rs. 1,00,000/- have been quantified by this Court as petty claims. Since the amount involved in this appeal is less than Rs.1,00,000/-, these appeals arising out...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Sendhaji
Judges:
22 June, 2012·It has been the consistent practice of this Court not to enter into the merits of those appeal wherein the claim is petty, and claims upto Rs. 1,00,000/- have been quantified by this Court as petty claims. Since the amount involved in this appeal is less than Rs.1,00,000/-, this appeal is dismissed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.