Arjunsinh vs State
Judges:
20 July, 2012·Learned counsel for the applicant, original complainant, does not press this application for cancellation of bail.This application is disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharged.However, in case if the accused commit breach of any of the conditions imposed vide order dated 2.4.2012 passed by the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Executive vs Unknown
Judges:
20 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Rule, returnable on 27.07.2012. Direct service permitted.(D.H.WAGHELA, J.) (J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) (binoy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ojas vs State
Judges:
20 July, 2012·1. The applicant is a under trial prisoner in connection with I CR No. 2 of 2012 for the offences punishable under sections 167, 406, 420, 465, 466, 467, 471, 474, 120B and 114 of IPC and 34 of IPC.2. This is an application for extension of temporary bail for a period of 30 days on account of surger...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashwinkumar vs Jerambhai
Judges:
20 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Draft amendment granted.Rule.Mr.Parmar, learned Counsel appears for respondent No.1 and waives service of notice of Rule. Mr.Dave, learned AGP for respondents No.2 and 3 and Mr.Dakshesh Mehta, learned Counsel for respondents No.4 and 6, waive service of not...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shitalbhai vs State
Judges:
20 July, 2012·1. Mr. Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the vehicles which were originally seized are now released and that therefore the cause for petition does not survive. He submitted that the petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent events.2. In view of the said sub...
High Court Of Gujarat
Asgar vs State
Judges:
20 July, 2012·The applicant/prisoner has taken-out this application seeking parole leave on account of his heart ailment. The certificate dated 12th July, 2012 produced on record indicates that the person was treated as indoor patient and was discharged on 01/05/2012 with clinically stable condition. In view of t...
High Court Of Gujarat
B vs Agricultural
Judges:
20 July, 2012·At the request of learned advocate for the respondent, S.O. to 24th July, 2012. The Secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, will remain present in person before this Court alongwith the amount in cash/cheque, which has wrongly been deducted from the amount of leave encashment of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parinaben vs Unknown
Judges:
20 July, 2012·Heard.Considering the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the main matter is restored on file. The application stands disposed of accordingly.The captioned petition to be listed for hearing on 23.07.2012.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs State
Judges:
20 July, 2012·Mr.S.P. Majmudar, learned Advocate states that he shall tender Affidavit-in-Rejoinder today. Hence, S.O. to 9.8.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs Bansidhar
Judges:
20 July, 2012·Order in Civil Application :Heard.Sufficient cause has been shown by the applicants to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. The main matter is restored on file. The application stands disposed of accordingly.[K.S. JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN Misc. Civil Application :Considering the averments m...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.