Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Arjunsinh vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|20 July, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the applicant, original complainant, does not press this application for cancellation of bail.
This application is disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharged.
However, in case if the accused commit breach of any of the conditions imposed vide order dated 2.4.2012 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa-Camp-Deodar, in Criminal Misc. Application No.164 of 2012, in connection with FIR No. C.R. No. I-197 of 2011, for the offences punishable under sections 302, 307, 326, 323, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, registered with Tharad Police Station, it will be open for the applicant-original complainant to take appropriate action in accordance with law, including to approach the concerned Court for appropriate relief.
(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arjunsinh vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
20 July, 2012