Kusumben vs State
Judges:
26 April, 2012·Notice returnable on 4.5.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajusinh vs Executive
Judges:
26 April, 2012·When the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present. She has filed sick note. On previous occasion also i.e. 28/02/2012, the petitioner did not attend the hearing. Since the date on which the petition is circulated for admission hearing, nobod...
High Court Of Gujarat
Juned vs State
Judges:
26 April, 2012·Learned advocate for the applicant contends that the applicant is not a person named in the chargesheet filed after the investigation and it is the case of the applicant that in view of his date of birth 31.12.1982 which is recorded in School Leaving Certificate viz-a-viz the date of offence dated 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
General vs None For
Judges:
26 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Delay of 54 days in filing the application for restoration is condoned and the application is allowed.(D.H.Waghela, J.) (Mohinder Pal, J.) *malek Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Soyebbhai vs State
Judges:
26 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) By way of this application, the applicant-convict has prayed that he be enlarged on temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend marriage of his daughter, which is scheduled to be held on 07.05.2012.Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Co...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Though
Judges:
26 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) 1.0 Though served, respondent Nos. 2 to 4 have not caused any appearance before the Court.2.0 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Pujari requested that fresh notice with bailable warrant be issued to serve them afresh.3.0 The request is granted. The...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhirendra vs This
Judges:
26 April, 2012·1. This Court by order dated 10.1.2012 passed in Special Civil Application No.175 of 2012 directed the applicant - original petitioner to file a representation. Para 6 of the said order dated 10.1.2012 reads as under:-"6) In view of the above, if such a representation is filed by the petitioner to r...
High Court Of Gujarat
Divij vs State
Judges:
26 April, 2012·The prayer made by the petitioner in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to quash and set aside the invocation of section 66 of The Information Technology Act, 2000, which pertains to computer related offences, cannot be granted in the midsts of investigation.In vie...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sumitra vs State
Judges:
26 April, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the efforts made by the petitioner before various authorities including the State Human Right Commission has not yielded any result. The husband of the petitioner may be an accused of an offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code in the backdrop o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.