Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii vs M/S Seshasayi Foods Pvt Ltd
Judges: Sanjay Kumar I, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
29 October, 2014·… Appellant And M/s. Seshasayi Foods Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.645 of 2014 Judgment : (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be pre...
High Court Of Telangana
Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii vs M/S P L Reddy & Co
Judges: Sanjay Kumar I, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
29 October, 2014·DATED:29.10.2014 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. P.L. Reddy & Co., Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.639 of 2014 Judgment : (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice S...
High Court Of Telangana
Nikhil Surana vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Sanjay Kumar I T, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
29 October, 2014·I.T.T.A. Nos.633 & 634 of 2014 Common Judgment : (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) These appeals are sought to be preferred against the common judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated 21.2.2014 in relation to assessment order 2009-10 on the following suggested que...
High Court Of Telangana
Nikhil Surana vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Sanjay Kumar I T, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
29 October, 2014·I.T.T.A. Nos.633 & 634 of 2014 Common Judgment : (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) These appeals are sought to be preferred against the common judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated 21.2.2014 in relation to assessment order 2009-10 on the following suggested que...
High Court Of Telangana
Commissioner Of Income Tax Central vs Balaji Steel Profiles
Judges: Challa Kodanda Ram, L Narasimha Reddy
29 October, 2014·The respondent is a manufacturer of steel and is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’). A search was conducted in the premises of the factory on 25-03-1999. On the basis of the discoveries said to have been made therein, the assessing officer initiated steps under Chapter...
High Court Of Telangana
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Intrack
Judges: Sanjay Kumar I, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
29 October, 2014·The Commissioner of Income Tax –V Hyderabad … Appellant And M/s. Intrack Inc D.No.2-3-21/2, Ranigunj Circle Secunderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.649 OF 2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice ...
High Court Of Telangana
G Sai Nagadeep And Another vs Gopagaoni Sreehari And 4 Others
Judges: A Rajasheker Reddy
29 October, 2014·G. Sai Nagadeep and another .. Appellants AND Gopagaoni Sreehari and 4 others .. Respondents ORDER: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY ASMP.No.2099 of 2014 and A.S.No.638 of 2012 Appellants 1 and 2 and respondents 4 and 5 are present in person before the Court and they are identified by their r...
High Court Of Telangana
Shaik Ameerjan vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
29 October, 2014·This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside show cause notice-cum- suspension order vide Rc.No.C1072/2014, dated 14.07.2014, of respondent No.3. I have heard Sri V.R.Mannepally, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. By the im...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Ankam Sangeetha vs The Government Of Telangana And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
29 October, 2014·ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.3 has not been releasing the essential commodities to the petitioner for distribution through the fair price shop of Yanampally Village, for which she holds authorisation. At the hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Civi...
High Court Of Telangana
Donga Padmavathi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
29 October, 2014·...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K. CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though she has filed a complaint on 16.08.2014 before the third respondent, no action is taken by the thi...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.