Imran Ahmad And Another vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 September, 2021·Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to dismiss this petition as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. Learned counsel for the caveator-contesting respondent has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, this writ peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Baran And Others vs D D C And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 September, 2021·Tiwari,B.P.Mishra,H.M.Srivastava,S.D.N.Singh,Shiv Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.N.Singh,S.N.Singh,Sanjay Srivastava Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. List has been revised. No one turned up on behalf of the parties. Learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent nos.1 to 3 is present. Off...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs Sundarkant Pandey And Another
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
23 September, 2021·Both parties have arrived at a compromise. With consent of Shri U.S.Singh Visen, learned counsel for the petitioner-Employer, Shri Nitinjay Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-Workman and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, the following order is being passed: I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sonmati Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
23 September, 2021·Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Indrakesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State. The writ petition arises out of proceedings taken out under Section 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by the petitioner which came to be register...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Usha Rani And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
23 September, 2021·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14084 of 2021 Petitioner :- Usha Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramanuj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Surendra Nath Tripathi,Syed Fahim Ahmed Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Akhtar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
23 September, 2021·Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Notice need not to be sent to the private respondents, at this stage. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon responde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bijendra @ Bijendra Kumar Nishad vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
23 September, 2021·Shri Mahesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private defendants have already entered appearance before the learned court below. Attention is called to the order sheet of the learned court below. It is contended that there is no reasonable cause for delay in deciding the af...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Society vs Lallu Singh And Others
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 September, 2021·Case :- WRIT - B No. - 14929 of 1989 Petitioner :- The Society For Agro Industrial Educatioin In India Respondent :- Lallu Singh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Prasad Mathur Counsel for Respondent :- SC, Jamwant Maurya,Pankaj Misra,R.K. Kakkar,S.K. Kakkar Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. List ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hanumant Paliwal vs Board Of
Judges: Dinesh Pathak
23 September, 2021·Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. Heard Sri Dinesh Rai, learned counsel, holding brief of Sri Bidhan Chandra Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel represents respondent nos.1 & 2 and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for dismissal of the present writ pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bank Of Maharashtra vs The Controllingauthority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act And Another
Judges: Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
23 September, 2021·Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 28.01.2020 passed by the respondent no. 1/Controlling Authority and Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Jhansi, determining the gratuity payable to the respondent no. 2 to the tune of Rs. 16,1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.