Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Akhtar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14654 of 2021 Petitioner :- Mohd. Akhtar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.B. Pal
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
Notice need not to be sent to the private respondents, at this stage.
This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon respondent no. 2 to conclude the mutation proceedings pending under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending and, as such, respondent no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the case No. 07390 of 2019 (Computer Case No. T201915060107390) (Mohd. Akhtar Vs. Azmal), in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, preferably within a period of next six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of the High Court.
Writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 23.9.2021 Shekhar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Akhtar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Advocates
  • Vinod Kumar Yadav