Smt. Bharati Prajapati And ... vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Judges: Rajiv Joshi
02 February, 2021·In support of their age, the petitioner no. 1 has brought on record her AADHAR Card, and petitioner no. 2 has brought on record his AADHAR Card, wherein the date of birth of the petitioner no. 1 is shown as 9.6.2001 and that of petitioner no. 2 as 18.6.1996. Thus, it appears from the record that bot...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babu Lal @ Pintu @ Doctor vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
02 February, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is not named in the FIR, which has been lodged against unknown persons. It is further submitted that the name of the applicant came in light on the basis of confessional statemen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sohan Lal vs Deenanath Chaturvedi And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not issue to the private-respondents. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura to decide the Tem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijayraj Bind vs Suresh Kumar Maurya And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), Bhadohi-Gyanpur to decide the temporary injunction appli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambuj Alias Dinesh Chandra Pandey vs Civil Judge
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause of the petition. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents. The petitioner is before this Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganesh Kumar Shahu And Others vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard Sri A.K. Srivastava, counsel for the petitioners and Sri Vikash Chandra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. After some arguments, counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer only to the effect to direct the appellate court to decide the pending ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vidhish Chand Pandey vs Mahendra Kumar Pandey And Another
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard Sri Manish Kumar Nigam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tripathi B.G. Bhai, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer toset a side the impugned or...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Panna Lal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Order on the Amendment Application Amendment application is allowed. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to incorporate necessary amendment in the body of the petition. Order on the Petition Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Guruj vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Ref:- Civil Misc. Correction Application No. 2 of 2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This is an application seeking correction in the order dated 28.01.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause during ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Naresh vs Munni Devi And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
02 February, 2021·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C., Jaunpur to decide the application No. 369C moved by the Plaintiff/Petitioner dated 22.05.2019 for dispossess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.