Purushottam vs Sri Kingal Singh
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
27 September, 2019·Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4914 of 2019 Applicant :- Purushottam Opposite Party :- Sri. Kingal Singh, Vice Chairman Kanpur Development Authority And Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.B. Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the contem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Shanker Umesh Kumar vs The Commissioner Of Trade Tax U P Lucknow
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 September, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 1632 of 2008 Revisionist :- Hari Shanker Umesh Kumar Opposite Party :- The Commissioner Of Trade Tax U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Revisionist :- Piyush Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. List revised. No one is present o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Kailash Motors vs The Commissioner Commercial Taxes U P Lucknow
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 September, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 1821 of 2008 Revisionist :- M/S Kailash Motors Opposite Party :- The Commissioner Commercial Taxes U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Revisionist :- Piyush Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. List revised. No one is present on ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Isha And Company vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes U P Lko
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 September, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 1882 of 2008 Revisionist :- Isha And Company Opposite Party :- Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes U.P. Lko. Counsel for Revisionist :- Kunwar Saksena Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. List revised. No one is present on behalf...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Kumar Gihar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur Chief
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Govind Mathur,Chief Justice Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. This petition for writ is preferred to have appropriate writ, order or direction for respondents to remove encroachment of Khata No. 41, Gata No. 534 Kha/0.13 Decimal and Khata No. 41, Gata No. 172 Kha/0.08 Decimal Mauja non Z.A. situated in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Janak Singh And Others vs Shyama Devi And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
27 September, 2019·Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 447 of 2019 Applicant :- Janak Singh And 7 Others Opposite Party :- Shyama Devi And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant. The transfer applicatio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur Chief
27 September, 2019·Hon'ble Govind Mathur,Chief Justice Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. This petition for writ said to be filed in public interest is before us to have following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the revisional order dated 29.08.2019 (Annexure No. 9) passed by r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nirmalya Welfare Society vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur Chief
27 September, 2019·For the same cause, the petitioner preferred a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 61423 of 2017 that came to be disposed of on 26.02.2018 in following terms: "Mr. Satyendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioners to a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kapoor Udyog vs Commissioner Trade Tax
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
27 September, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 910 of 2009 Revisionist :- Kapoor Udyog Opposite Party :- Commissioner Trade Tax Counsel for Revisionist :- Krishna Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Sri Krishna Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist states that...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Zaheeruddin vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Govind Mathur Chief
27 September, 2019·From perusal of the document annexed with the petition for writ, it is apparent that an enquiry has already been initiated. In view of it, no direction as prayed for to initiate enquiry is required to be given. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Rameez . (Vivek Varma,J.) (Govind...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.