Prem Pal vs Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari Bareilly And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
22 February, 2019·2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorai quashing the impugned order dated 22.9.2002 passed by the respondent No. 1 the Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Bareilly (Annexure-7 to the writ petition). i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Awadh Yadav vs Director Local Bodies And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
22 February, 2019·1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandam...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bagasara Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
22 February, 2019·Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: "(i) to issue a writ, order or directi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Kavya Enterprises Group C- Agra And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
22 February, 2019·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State- respondents and Sri Shyam Mani Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Nagar Nigam. At the very outset, learned counsel for...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Kavya Enterprises Group C- Agra And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
22 February, 2019·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Heard Sri Tapesh Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Shri Shyam Mani Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondent-Nagar Nigam. The petitioner appears t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
K K Awasthi And Others vs The Union Of India And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
22 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5896 of 2019 Petitioner :- K K Awasthi And 5 Others Respondent :- The Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Shrivastava,Hemlata Srivastava,Romeshwari Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Kumar Rai Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarita Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
22 February, 2019·Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel for the State-respondents. This petition has been filed for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide Case No.469/1879 of 2010 (Sarita Devi v. Shailendra Ballabh Pandey), under Section 34/35 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gayatri Devi vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
22 February, 2019·Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Heard Sri Omkar Nath Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the State-respondent. The only relief pressed in this petition is that the Mutation Case No.T2016054465435862 (Smt. Gayatri Devi Vs. Pasmati), under Section 35 of U.P. Rev...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
22 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5895 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amresh Singh Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. The only grievance of petitioner is that the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
22 February, 2019·Heard Shri Murtuza Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the validity of the impugned order dated 25.1.2019 passed by the second respondent, Collec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.