Mitthu Lal Singh @ Mitthu Singh & ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
29 August, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pappu & Ors. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
29 August, 2019·3. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) allegedly committed entail a sentence up to seven years. In such circumstances, the investigating officer shall ensure compliance of provisions of Section 41 and Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure as provided by Hon'bl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Ram Sharma And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Basic Edu. ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
29 August, 2019·The case set-forth by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a handicapped person and is serving on the post of Assistant Teacher under Physically Handicapped category at Prathamik Vidyalaya, Akha, Baheri, district-Bareilly from 10.02.2009. Since the factum of handicapped of va...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Israr & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
29 August, 2019·After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to surrender and move bail application, before the court concerned and suitab...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Constable Ram Pravesh Yadav vs Raj Kumar ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
29 August, 2019·Sri Devesh Pathak, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party no.2 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Juned Khan vs State Of U.P. Thru. Collector ...
Judges: Vivek Chaudhary
29 August, 2019·Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the pending suit no. 704 under section 229-B, U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act(computerized No. T20164040303595)(Yaseen Versus Mahaveer and Others) within stipulated time. Looking into the facts and circumst...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Kumar Pandey vs M.V.S.Rami ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
29 August, 2019·The petitioner has also preferred a representation dated 26.12.2018, but no decision has been taken in the aforesaid representation. He has further submitted that the ends of justice would suffice if necessary direction is issued to the authority concerned for disposal of the said representation. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Abha Singh vs Alok Singh
Judges: Vivek Chaudhary
29 August, 2019·Heard learned counsel for applicant. Submission of learned counsel for applicant is that applicant has filed a Suit No.1208 of 2017 for maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. which is pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Regu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Pal Singh & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
29 August, 2019·Heard Sri Tanay Hazari, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri Manish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri Shobit Mohan Shukla, learned Counsel for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4. The order which is impugned in this petition dated 12.7.2019 has been withdrawn vide order dated 29...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Momina Khatoon & Anr. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
29 August, 2019·This petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus commanding the the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful marriage life of the petitioners. The petitioners are present in person before the Court and have been identified by their counsel. It has been alleged that both of them are major and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.