M/S Janmejai Singh Thru. Prop. Mr ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Alok Mathur
30 August, 2019·Heard Sri Amit Kumar Singh Bhadauria, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Dixit, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shree Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the parties submits that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the petiti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santram vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
30 August, 2019·4- Considering the entire facts of the case, this Court has passed the order dated 27.08.2019, which reads as under:- "Notices on behalf opposite parties has been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The sole grieva...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sundari Devi vs State Of U.P.Thru Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
30 August, 2019·Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as there are certain discrepancies in the pleadings of the present writ petition, therefore, he may be permitted to not press the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition. Learned Counsel for the opposite parties have no object...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Govind Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
30 August, 2019·In view of the proposed order notice to opposite party no. 4 is dispensed with. By means of this petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 25.6.2019 passed by the Managing Director, U.P. Seed Development Corporation, Lucknow. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surya Nath Verma vs Board Of Revenue, Lko. Thru ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Jaspreet Singh
30 August, 2019·Heard Brijesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary learned counsel for the respondents. As per instructions dated 29th of August, 2019, Civil Suit No.T-201904040103375, Civil Suit No.T-201904040103376, Civil Suit No.T-201904040103085, Civil Suit No.T-20...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lallan Bahadur Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
30 August, 2019·Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-opposite parties submitted that the petitioner has failed to make out a case for issuance of a writ or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 7.6.2019 but since petitioner has not entered into the merits of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahdu Saharan vs State Of U.P. Thru. Collector ...
Judges: Saurabh Lavania
30 August, 2019·The petitioner prays for a direction to allow him to deposit the amount of Rs.19,45,267/- i.e. dues of the Respondent no.3-Allabahad Bank, Branch Anjrauli, District- Ayodhya, in easy installments. Shri Vinay Shanker, learned counsel who appears for the Respondent no.3-Allabahad Bank, Branch Anjrauli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajan vs Smt. Rubi
Judges: Rajendra Kumar Iv
30 August, 2019·. Court No. - 27 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 267 of 2009 Revisionist :- Rajan Opposite Party :- Smt. Rubi Counsel for Revisionist :- Mohd. Ayub Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. Since this criminal revision has been filed beyond time and application seekin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Mamta Misra vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajeev Singh
30 August, 2019·The submissions of learned counsel for the applicant are that the applicant is innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case, she is having no previous criminal history and in jail since 09.07.2019. It is further submitted that the complainant is the neighbor of the applicant and when ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rima Devi & Anr. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home & ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 August, 2019·This petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to create unnecessary hindrance in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners and not to disturb their mental peace and personal life and liberty. It has been alleged that both the petitioners are major and have mar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.