Gudiya @ Japani Gudiya And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
29 April, 2019·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Heard Sri K.K. Singh for the petitioners, Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey for respondent-4 and A.G.A. for the State of U.P. Gudiya @ Japani Gudiya (petitioner-1) has been produced from Western Shelter Home(Organization) Jaitpura, district Varanasi by SI...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Devki And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
29 April, 2019·Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Heard Sri Bindeshwari Prasad Mishra for the petitioners and AGA for State. Detenu, Smt. Devki has been produced before this Court from Rajkiya Mahila Sharnalaya, Swaroop Nagar, Kanpur by HCP 658 Malkhan Singh, HC 318 Brijendra Singh, HC 620 Ja...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Soni And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rajul Bhargava
29 April, 2019·Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to issue a writ or direction in the nature of habeas corpus directing the respondent no.4 to produce the petitioner...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Zarina Bano And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
29 April, 2019·Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 309 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Zarina Bano And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Smt. Zarina Bano (petitioner-1) has b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pushpa Rani And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rajul Bhargava
29 April, 2019·Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 42 of 2019 Petitioner :- Pushpa Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidya Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. Sri Vidya Shanker Pandey, counsel for the petitioners states tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Poonam Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
29 April, 2019·Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 332 of 2019 Petitioner :- Poonam Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Poonam Devi (petitioner-1) has bee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nisha And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
29 April, 2019·Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 310 of 2019 Petitioner :- Nisha And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Short counter affidavit filed today i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheetal Kumari And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
29 April, 2019·Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 334 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sheetal Kumari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Sheetal Kumari(petitioner-1) h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sushma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rajul Bhargava
29 April, 2019·Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 5 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Sushma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Arun Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J. Case has been called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even in th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sangram Prasad And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
29 April, 2019·5. On the allegation of the petitioner, this Court on 08.03.2019 passed the following order:- "Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that Plot No. 461M having an area 0.1260 has been earmarked as general abadi in form CH-41 and CH45. No lease can be granted in respect of the land earm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.