Nand Kumar And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Bala Krishna Narayana
29 October, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State. Petitioners have approached this Court with a request to quash the FIR registered as Case Crime No. 223 of 2018, under sections 60/64 UP Excise Act and sections 419, 420, 120-B IPC, Police Station Shoharatgarh,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noushad And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Bala Krishna Narayana
29 October, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 13.10.2018 registered as Case Crime No.1146 of 2018 under Sectio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balram Krishna Pandey And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
29 October, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Piyush Tripathi for the respondent no. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners have come up praying for certiorari to quash the notification dated 28th June, 2018 as ultravires in so far as it excludes B.Ed. (Special Education) as the minimum qualific...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Kesar Buildteck Pvt Ltd vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
29 October, 2018·Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 3. The petitioner contends that the recommendations which have been made on 12th September, 2017 by the Commissioner himself, and which is pending b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Bharati Sapru
29 October, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35885 of 2018 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. In the writ petition, the petitioner does not dis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijraj vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
29 October, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Tariq Maqbool Khan, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. The only grievance of the petitioner is that his Revision No.1721 of 2015 (Computerized Case No.C2015050000...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumari vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
29 October, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the Case No.77/2000-01 (New Case No.12/2007-08/77-2010-11) under Section 176 of UP ZA & LR Act (Smt. Raj Kumari vs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aashna And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Kaushal Jayendra
29 October, 2018·Petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty. The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sobha vs State Of U P
Judges: Neeraj Tiwari
29 October, 2018·Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1712 of 1988 Revisionist :- Sobha Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- S.S.P. Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. As per office report dated 22.10.2018, the sole revisionist Sobha has died on 26.3.2009. In view of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Durgawati Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
29 October, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard Sri Rajnath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Kr. Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. In pith and substance the petitioner has asked the respondent to take an appropriate action on the applications as prayed a mandamu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.