Nitin Keshav Ji vs State Of U.P.Through Secy. Home ...
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 528 of 2008, under Sections 406 & 420 IPC, police station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. We have gone through the contents of the FIR, which disclose commission of cognizable offence, as such, the the same cannot be quash...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ras Bihari Lal S/O Late N N Lal vs State Of U P Thr.Secy.Home Civil ...
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Under challenge in this petition is FIR relating to case crime no 237 of 2010 under Section 135 (1) (e) of the Electricity Act of police station Aliganj, district Lucknow. As it comes out electricity connection which was given to the petitioner for the purpose of residential use was being used by hi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Constable 2160 C.P. Satya Prakash ... vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Put up tomorrow ie. 24.6.2010 to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file supplementary affidavit. Order Date :- 23.6.2010 SKS...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rinku @ Shiv Kumar vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges:
23 June, 2010·As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, put up on 08.07.2010 as fresh. Order Date :- 23.6.2010 Jaideep/-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umesh Kumar Bansal vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Co-accused is said to have been bailed out. Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced, the applicant is entitled for bail. Let the applicant Umesh Kumar Bansal involved in Case Crime No. 130 of 2010 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 485, 486 I.P.C. and section 63/65 of the Copy Rights Act ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Kailash Rawat vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A for the State. It is argued on behalf of the applicant regarding the genuineness of the prosecution case that the applicant has been falsely involved in the case . That nine cases have been shown in the gang chart . Out of which he ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Narendra Bahadur Chand vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that there was some business transaction in between the parties as Franchise was given for running Computer Centre. Since there was some misunderstanding in be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balendra @ Chotu And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the present matter is a matrimonial matter and the said matter can be well considered by the Mediation Centre of this Court. After having and gone through the entire facts and circumstances on record in the light of the contention of the learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinai @ Vikki Pranami vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant was falsely implicated in the present case showing the recovery after a month of country made pistol, cartridge and Rs.10,000/- alleged looted amount from the petrol pump. The incident is dated 2.3.2010, however, the recovery was shown from ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anwar @ Patu vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
23 June, 2010·Allegation against the applicant is that it is a cross case and one person from either side has lost his life. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the allegation of using fire arm has been made against the applicant. Co- accused Parvez alias Mallu has already been released on bail by thi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.