Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant was falsely implicated in the present case showing the recovery after a month of country made pistol, cartridge and Rs.10,000/- alleged looted amount from the petrol pump. The incident is dated 2.3.2010, however, the recovery was shown from the applicant on 6.4.2010 and on the same day applicant was challaned under the Arms Act and under looting case. Apart from the aforesaid case the applicant was challaned in one case under Section 304-A IPC in the year 2006. There is no other criminal history of the applicant. The prayer for bail of co-accused Chandra Bhan Singh and Suresh Chandra has already been allowed. He further submits that applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail and he will not indulge in any such activities if he is released on bail. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 11 of the application. In the present case, the applicant is in jail since 6.4.2010.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merit, let the applicant Vinai @ Vikki Pranami be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in Case Crime No.16 of 2010, under Section 392/411 IPC, P.S. Aung, District Fatehpur.
Order Date :- 23.6.2010 Pramod