Simaben vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers;(a) This petition may kindly be admitted,(b) Your lordship may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ashokbhai vs The
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, at this stage, learned advocate for the petitioner handed over two cheques dated 16.05.2012 and 09.06.2012 each of Rs.50,000/- to the learned advocate for the respondent-bank.It will be open for the respondent-bank to deposit the said c...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Revision Application ... vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
10 May, 2012·CR.RA/210/2012 1/2 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 210 of 2012 ====================================== RUPESH R BHATIYA Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ====================================== Appearance :MR ABHIRAJ R TRIVEDI ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sher vs Unknown
Judges:
10 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)1. In view of the explanation submitted in the applications, they are ALLOWED.2. The original petitions are restored to files and the applicants are permitted to remove the office objections on or before 11TH JUNE, 2012. If, the office objections are not remo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chaturbhai vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. This Application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with the offence being CR No.I-30 of 2002 registered with Morva Police Station, Panchmahal for the offences u/s. 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Heard Mr.Mehul S. Shah, learned advo...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalpesh vs Manit
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. The applicants have taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief:"6(A) Your Lordships will be pleased to permit the applicants to be impleaded as party respondent Nos.5 to 34 in Special Civil Application No.6767 of 2012 in the interest of justice."2. The applicants have stated tha...
High Court Of Gujarat
General vs Rammilan
Judges:
10 May, 2012·While issuing Rule vide order dated 10.05.2012, this Court has directed that the undisputed amount as referred to in the Affidavit at Page Nos.98-99 of the petition shall be paid to each of the workmen by Account Payee Cheques after proper verification. Pursuant thereto, the Registry had put up a No...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hiren vs Hetalben
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Shah for the applicant states that the applicant - husband will deposit 50% amount of the arrears of maintenance before the concerned trial Court.On depositing such amount of maintenance by the applicant, Office is directed to issue Notice returnable on 17.7.2012.(Z.K.SAIYED,J.)...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jashvant vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Heard Mr. Vijay H. Nangesh, learned advocate for the applicant.Issue Rule, returnable on 11th May 2012. Ms. Archana Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.(HARSHA DEVANI,J.) Vahid Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Himchandbhai vs Kaliyabhai
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Learned Advocate Mr. Shelat urges that at initial stage, present petitioner was protected by way of interim injunction in terms of maintenance of status quo in respect of the suit property, which continued for a long time. However, the same has been discontinued by the Appellate Court by an order im...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.