CR.RA/210/2012 1/2 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 210 of 2012 ====================================== RUPESH R BHATIYA Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ====================================== Appearance :
MR ABHIRAJ R TRIVEDI for Applicant(s) : 1, MR KP RAVAL ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent(s) : 2, ====================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED Date : 10/05/2012 ORAL ORDER On 8.5.2012, this Court has passed following order :
1. "Rule. Mr.K.P. Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1State.
2. Heard Mr.Abhiraj Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant. He states that wife of the applicant and respondent No.2 is personally present before the Court. He has further stated that wife of the applicant is ready to deposit Rs.15,000/ (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with the concerned Court and rest of the amount will be deposited in five equal monthly installments before the concerned Court.
3. The original complainant states that if the wife of the applicant deposits Rs.15,000/ with the concerned Court, then he has no objection for grant of bail to the CR.RA/210/2012 2/2 ORDER applicant.
4. The concerned Court is directed to accept Rs.15,000/ from the wife of the applicant, if she approaches the Court. The matter is now adjourned to 10 th May, 2012. On that day, wife of the applicant is directed to produce receipt showing deposition of Rs.15,000/ with the concerned Court.
Direct service is permitted, today."
Heard. The complainant is present.
Perused the orders passed by the Courts below. Learned advocate produced the copy of the receipt showing the amount deposited before the concerned trial Court, which is ordered to be taken on record. Considering the fact that the Revision is arising from the short sentence imposed by the learned Judge and considering the pendency of large number of matters and considering the provisions under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I am of the view that during the hearing of this Revision, the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000/ (Rupees five thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court on usual terms and conditions. Direct service is permitted.
(Z.K.SAIYED,J.) ynvyas