Sajid vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·It is submitted that while performing duty as a lawyer, the petitioner has taken care of interest of his client only and no further allegation is made. It is, therefore submitted that issuance of process qua the application is illegal.In view of the above, issue notice returnable on 25th June, 2012....
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajak vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with CR No. I 12 of 2012 registered with Navabandar Marine Police Station, District Junagadh, for the offence punishable under Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yogeshwar vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been filed, with the following prayers :"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dtd. 27.2.2012 passed by the Resp. No.1 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Sunilbhai
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 04.06.2008 between Maruti Van bearing registration No.GJ-22A-252 and S.T. Bus No. MH-12-UA-8930 and in the said accident one Kanbhen Sunilbhai Agrwal, passenger of Maruti Van died in the said accident. Therefore, the father of the decea...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Babubhai
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 27.03.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Bhavnagar (for short, "the Tribunal") in M.A.C.P. No.261/1997 whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed and respondents no.1, original claimant, was awarded tot...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maheshkumar vs Surat
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Notice returnable on 11th July 2012.Petitioner has sought to place certain documents on record.The documents must be placed on record under an affidavit. Therefore, at this stage the documents are not received on record. However, petitioner is permitted to place the documents on record under an affi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jivabhai vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·This petition is preferred by the petitioner to grant him parole on the ground that father of the petitioner expired on 19.12.2010 and to perform post obsequies ritual as per Hindu customary rites, his presence is necessary. In addition to above it is submitted that niece of the petitioner was also ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sukhlal vs City
Judges:
10 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Leave to add the person against whom allegations are made, as party respondent to the application.Notice returnable on June 21, 2012.Direct service permitted.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.] [J.B.PARDIWALA, J.] pirzada/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vipulkumar vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. By way of intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the original petitioner has challenged the order dated 17.2.2012 passed in Special Civil Application No.2316 of 2012, by which learned Single Judge has refused to issue directions in the n...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Ramaben
Judges:
10 May, 2012·STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Petitioner(s) Versus RAMABEN DHIRAJLAL - Respondent(s) ===================================================== Appearance :MS SHRUTI PATHAK, AGP for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2.RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1, ===================================================== CORAM :HONOURABLE M...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.