Masukhbhai vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that respondent No.6 has expired. Mr.Paresh M. Darji, learned advocate for the petitioner, prays for time, in order to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased-respondent.List on 20.04.2012.The status-quo order granted earlier, shall ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Petlad vs Regional
Judges:
28 March, 2012·1. Heard Mr. B.R. Gupta, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Niral R. Mehta, learned advocate for the respondent.2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-"(A) To allow this petition and to issue appropriat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs Commissioner
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the explanation given in the application for condonation of delay, we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out for not preferring the Appeal with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gulabchand vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed by the petitioner with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing respondent No.1 to make inquiry in respect of tardy and dela...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Shyam
Judges:
28 March, 2012·This Court on 22.03.2012 has passed the following order:"1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.The learned counsel for the petitioner has invited this court's attention to the terms of the notice inviting tender, wherein the original period for lifting the entire quantity was three months and a...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Rasikbhai
Judges:
28 March, 2012·In view of death of learned counsel for respondent No.1, fresh notice be issued to respondent No.1 making it returnable on 30th April 2012.In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the appellant shall take steps for unserved respondent No.2 failing which matter will be dismissed qua unserved respondent ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Unknown
Judges:
28 March, 2012·(Per : THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D.S.SINHA) On the request of Ms. Falguni D.Patel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the matters may come on board after two months.(D. S. Sinha, C. J.) (B. C. Patel, J.) parekh...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehboobkhan vs State
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Notice to the respondents returnable on 3.4.2012. Learned APP Mr. HL Jani waives service of notice for respondent No.1-State. Respondent No.2 permitted to be served by D.S.(Rajesh H.Shukla, J.) (hn) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special vs Vinodbhai
Judges:
28 March, 2012·The present civil applications have been filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the First Appeal under sec. 5 of the Limitation Act on the grounds stated in the application inter alia procedural delay in getting necessary approval after completing the formalities/procedure.Heard learned AGP...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Mr Dk Acharya For
Judges:
28 March, 2012·Mr.J.P.Bhatt appearing for the petitioener submits that, the petitioners would like to withdraw the petition with a view to make representation with the competent ahthority of the respondent trust for pending them atternative accomodation.Without expressing any comment on merits permission is grante...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.