Ahmedabad vs Manojkumar
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mrs. VD Nanavati for the applicant. She submits that the food article was collected from Ahmedabad but it was sent to Rajkot as the Laboratory at Ahmedabad was not functioning at the relevant time.In view of the above, leave to appeal is granted. The application stands dispose...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gitaben vs District
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Rule.Mr.Maulik Nanavati, learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.3 - jail authority. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention. Direct service is permitted qua respondent Nos.1 and 2.[M.D.Shah, J.] satish...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Hiraben
Judges:
14 March, 2012·In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 3(A) & (c). The application stands disposed of accordingly.Issue Fresh Notice to the respondent No.5, in the main matter by substitute service, returnable on 26th April 2012.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manoharlal vs District
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Notice returnable on 9.4.2012.Learned APP, Mr. R. C. Kodekar, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.2 - State.Direct service for rest of the respondents is permitted.(A.L. DAVE, J.) (MOHINDER PAL, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raghubhai vs The
Judges:
14 March, 2012·1. The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief:"(B) Your Lordship may be pleased to permit the applicant to annex the documents as Annexures 'G','H','I' in the main special civil application and be pleased to fix the final hearing of the main matter in the interest...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Bai
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Opponent NO.1 has been served. No one appear for said opponent. Learned A.G.P. Mr. Dave appears for the Land Acquisition Officer.Counsel for the applicant Mr. Trivedi stated under the instructions that the entire amount awarded by the Reference Court along ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paschim vs Mr
Judges:
14 March, 2012·The present Civil Application has been filed by the applicant - original to substitute / amend the names and description of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in view of the change of circumstances as stated in the application.Heard learned advocate Mr.Mehul S. Shah for the applicant.In the facts and circum...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Umargam
Judges:
14 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicants-original defendant challenging the impugned order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Umargaon dated 23/02/2012 below Exh. 14 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 3...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saurashtra vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate Mr. D.M. Thakkar for the applicant. He submitted that pursuant to the agreement between the parties, advance payment was made for the goods to be supplied by the respondent accused but the respondent accused did not supply the goods and the cheque given by the respondent accus...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Appearance
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Niraj Buch for learned advocate Mr. N.P. Nanavati for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 states that learned advocate Mr. N.P. Nanavati has left the profession and has gone abroad. Therefore, he had informed respondent Nos. 4 and 5 about the matter and sought instructions to appear in the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.