Pesticides vs Union
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Mr.V.H.Kanara, Additional Central Government Counsel seeks time for filing affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 2 by competent authorized officer or employee. At his request, matter is kept on 28.03.2012.[S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.] JYOTI Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mathursinh vs Unknown
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Process fees to be paid on or before 19/03/2012 failing which the application shall stand dismissed for default automatically without referring the matter to the Court.(M.R.SHAH, J.) siji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahammad vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
14 March, 2012·The applicant - original petitioner has taken out present application seeking direction to the respondents to calculate and pay the provisional pension before his case raised in the writ petition is decided.2. The service of the applicant was terminated on disciplinary ground after conducting inquir...
High Court Of Gujarat
R vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·1. The applicants have taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief:"(A) Your Lordships be pleased to grant a final hearing dated for the hearing of Special Civil Application No.10496/2002 before 31.03.2011."2. It is not in dispute that the applicants are in service.3. The petition h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Dipak R Dave For
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Amendment as per the draft amendment for adding appellant Nos. 8 and 9 is allowed. Amendment shall be carried out immediately.Learned counsel Mr. R. N. Singh fairly stated at the outset that the appeal is entirely covered by decision dated 10.11.2012 of Divi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Deputy vs Ms
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Heirs of deceased Opponent NO.1 and 2 have been served. No one appear for such opponents. Learned A.G.P. Mr. Dave appears for the Land Acquisition Officer.Counsel for the applicant Mr. Trivedi stated under the instructions that the entire amount awarded by ...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Raval
Judges:
14 March, 2012·BELOW SPEAKING TO MINUTES NOTE1. Perused the Speaking to Minutes Note. Para 4 of the order dated 27.02.2012 shall read as under:"Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Ghanshyam D. Acharya for Mr. P.R. Nanavaty, learned advocate appears for the respondent no. 1. Though served none appears for ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pthan vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and on perusal of the record, it appears that the Aanganwadi was constructed and no hindrance as such appears.In view of the above. Rule. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue as interim relief till final disposal of the application.(ANANT S...
High Court Of Gujarat
Anjanaben vs Learned
Judges:
14 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that despite directions from this Court and order dated 12.7.2011 in Special Civil Application No. 3952 of 2011, respondent has not decided the representation of the applicant within the time permitted. He stated ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arjunsinh vs State
Judges:
14 March, 2012·Mr.S.P.Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits that he would like to amend the Memorandum of the petition, at Page 1, wherein the provisions of law under which the petition has been filed, have been described. Permission to do so is granted. The necessary amendment be carried out fort...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.