Shantaben vs District
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Mr.Rohan Yagnik, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that he shall be appearing for respondents Nos.1 and 2, in addition to respondent No.3 and prays for time in order to file an affidavit-in-reply.List on 11.04.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ~gaurav~ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hiralal vs State
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Pursuant to the order dated 09.03.2012 passed by this Court, Registrar [Judicial] submitted explanation dated 15.03.2012. The said submission is ordered to be taken on record.Post the matter on 20th March, 2012.[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amitkumar vs State
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner.Rule.Mr. J.K.Shah, learned APP waives service of notice for respondent - State of Gujarat.At the joint request of learned advocate for the petitioner, this matter is taken up for final disposal.The petitioner has filed this petition with a prayer to modify t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Mr Ps Champaneri For
Judges:
16 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Issue NOTICE returnable on April 13, 2012.Since the petitioner has prayed to declare Section 3(2), 3(3) and 10 of the Industrial Development Bank (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act, 2003 as ultravires the Constitution of India...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Majmudar For Petitioner Nos.1
Judges:
16 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The petitioner has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution praying to hold the award dated 25.9.1997 in favour of the petitioner to be illegal and unlawful and to direct the respondent authorities to return the land which was acquired from the petitioner and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs Mr.R.C.Jani
Judges:
16 March, 2012·1. Mr.R.C.Jani, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant - appellant - original plaintiff seeks permission to delete respondent No.1 as respondent No.2, who is son of respondent No.1 is already on record. Permission is accordingly granted. Name of respondent No.1 stands deleted.Registry...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hinaben vs Kamleshkumar
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Heard Mr.M.M.Tirmizi, learned advocate for the applicant and perused the relevant papers. The main matter came to be disposed of on 30.04.2010 for want of removal of office objections.Mr.M.M.Tirmizi, learned advocate for the applicant submits that he shall remove the office objections within two wee...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sundar vs State
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Today, pursuant to the earlier direction dated 14.3.2012, Mr.Raval, learned APP for the respondent No.1 - State presented the investigation files along with the xerox copy of the alleged suicide note. It is further submitted that the original copy of the suicide note has been sent to F.S.L. for the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Jasvantsinh
Judges:
16 March, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of para 6[a] and [d]. The application stands disposed of accordingly.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL :-Notice to respondents nos. 4 and 5 returnable on 07.05.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.