Kirtisinh vs Zala
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Present Civil Application for interim relief has been preferred by the applicant herein-original appellant to stay the further implementation and operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 31.12.2007 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Mehesana passed in Regular Civil Suit No.20 of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jakirhussain vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) Rule.Mr.Pandya, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule.By way of this application, the applicant - convict has prayed that he be enlarged on temporary bail on the ground that he wants to attend the bismilla ceremony of his daughter, which is schedu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kaka vs The
Judges:
20 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) Mr. B. S.Brahmbhatt, learned Advocate, appearing for the respondents No. 3 to 6 has expired. Registry is directed to issue fresh Notice to Respondents No. 3 to 6 returnable on 30.4.2012 informing them the demise of their Advocate Mr. B.S. Brahmbhatt, for maki...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sami vs Vikrambhai
Judges:
20 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 14.7.2011 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in Special Civil Application No.8785 of 2011 whereby directions were issued to respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein to consider the case of respondent No.1 and after e...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Rashmikant
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred by original opponent no.2 against the judgment and award dated 02.12.2011 passed in M.A.C.P. No. 420/2006 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Rajkot whereby, the claim petition was allowed in part and respondent no.1, original claimant, was awarded total c...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel vs United
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred by original opponents no.1 & 2 in Claim Case No.91/1985 preferred by respondent no.2, original claimant, claiming total compensation of Rs.3.15 Lacs in connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 17.09.1984 involving a Tractor bearing registration No. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bank vs Official
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. In this matter earlier this Court (Coram : Honourable Mr.Justice K.M.Thaker) vide order dated 06.03.2012 has observed as under :"4. It is made clear to all the secured creditors that until and unless the entire set of documents (in original) are not handed over to the auction purchaser, any furth...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parmar vs Executive
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 30.07.2011, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mehsana, in Reference (LCM) No. 718 of 2008(old No. 68 of 2005), whereby the Reference Court has dismissed the said Reference.2. The brief facts leading t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surat vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. The present Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been preferred by the applicant herein to condone the delay of 167 days in preferring the Second Appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the learned 6th Additional District Judge, Surat in Regular Civil Appeal No. 41...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mukhi vs Sarpanch
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioners upon instruction submits that petitioners will consider complying of specifications provided by Sub-Divisional Magistrate in its order dated 6.9.2011 to construct an outlet as suggested with some modifications.Stand over to 30.3.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita//...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.