Dipak vs Commissioner
Judges:
20 March, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 09.12.2011 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tops vs Assitant
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Draft amendment is granted.Notice to the respondents, returnable on 12th April, 2012.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner-company has already deposited 4,10,000/- on 13.1.2011, Rs.96,107/- on 3.3.2011, Rs.76,000/- on 15.7.2011, Rs.6,93,000/- on 26.3.2011, Rs.36,213/- on 29.3...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baldev vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·By way of present successive bail application, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with offence being C.R. No.I-320 of 2011 registered with Gandhidham Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 1290(B) and 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chauhan vs Mahmadali
Judges:
20 March, 2012·On 29.02.2012, this Court had passed the following order:"Learned counsel for the appellant has not taken necessary steps in pursuance of the order dated 31.01.2012 passed by this Court. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed qua unserved respondent no.1. To be listed for final hearing on 13.03.2012."Mr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Priyankabahen vs Ismailmiya
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 12.01.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Aux.], Sabarkantha at Himatnagar in M.A.C.P. No. 40/1993, whereby the said claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimant was awarded total compensation of Rs....
High Court Of Gujarat
Dantani vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-56 of 2011 registered with Santhal Police Station, District - Mehsana for the offence under sections 302, 504 and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vasuben vs Satarbhai
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. The present application has been preferred by the applicants permitting them to be brought on record as appellants nos. 1/1 to 1/4 in Second Appeal No. 264/2010 and Civil Application, if any, in the said Second Appeal as heirs and legal representatives of the original appellant-Shri Rameshchandra...
High Court Of Gujarat
J vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Mr.Supehia, learned Advocate for petitioner has placed on record letter dated 7th February 2011 written by the petitioner to the respondent No.3. Mr. Supehia, learned Advocate has submitted that his client i.e. the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the petition on the basis of his own letter...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranchhodbhai vs Official
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Notice returnable on 12.04.2012.Mr.Jagdish S. Yadav, learned advocate appearing for the Official Liquidator waives service of notice on behalf of the Official Liquidator.Mr.Yadav, learned advocate has requested for time to take instructions regarding entitlement of the applicant herein by the return...
High Court Of Gujarat
Subhankar vs Executive
Judges:
20 March, 2012·After the order dated 13th March 2012, the petitioner has not informed the Court about the course of action which the petitioner would like to adopt. Today, when the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, neither the learned Advocate for petitioner nor learned Advocate for respondent are p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.