National vs Vasantbhai
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Dakshesh Mehta, learned advocate, for the appellant-Insurance Company.Learned advocate submits that in view of decision in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sinitha & Ors. [2011 (13) Scale 84] now it is open for the Insurance Company to raise defence even in a claim petition u...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sarinkumar vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Akash Patel states that the clients have taken the papers and he is not appearing in the matter. Therefore, in the interest of justice, fresh notice is ordered to be issued to the petitioners-original accused, returnable on 31.7.2012.The name of learned advocate Mr. Akash Patel ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jill vs Recover
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Though served none appears for respondent No.5-Bank.Rule.Expedited.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) niru* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
P vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:(A) That this Hon'ble High Court may issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the order dated 03.04.2012 passed by the respond...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahesh vs Paschim
Judges:
19 June, 2012·Heard Mrs. Sheth, learned Advocate for petitioner and Mr. Hasurkar, learned Advocate for respondent.Under order dated 16.12.2011, the office was directed to issue notice to the respondents making it returnable on 11.01.2012. Since then, until now, though almost five months have passed, respondents h...
High Court Of Gujarat
Trustees vs Aiyesha
Judges:
19 June, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the applicant-original judgment creditor to quash and set aside the impugned order passed by the learned executing Court-learned 2nd Additional Judge and Small Causes Court at Vadodara da...
High Court Of Gujarat
R vs State
Judges:
19 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:(A) That this Hon'ble High Court may issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the order dated 12.04.2012 passed by the respond...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yasin vs It
Judges:
19 June, 2012·It has been stated in the reply filed by the respondent Corporation that the Corporation has addressed a letter to the Deputy Secretary, Port and Transport on 27.04.2012 in reference to the earlier letter dated 27.02.2012 and has again requested the Deputy Secretary to take necessary approval from t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dinesh vs Sindhu
Judges:
19 June, 2012·During the course of hearing learned advocate Shri Mehul S. Shah appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petitioner is desirous of preferring an application for amendment of the plaint and subsequent thereto, if permissible under the law, petitioner wishes...
High Court Of Gujarat
Viraj vs Union
Judges:
19 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) We have heard learned advocate Mr.Deven Parikh, assisted by learned advocate Mr.Nirav Shah for the petitioner and learned Assistant Solicitor General of India Mr.P.S.Champaneri for the respondents.In the affidavit-in-reply filed by the Deputy Director, Direc...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.