Spl vs Sushilaben
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Learned advocate,Mr.Sheth states at the bar that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 1/5. He is permitted to file his Vakalatnama within a week.Having heard the learned AGP, Mr.P.P.Banaji and having regard to the facts and circumstances, this application filed for bringin...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagrutiben vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·1. By filing this application, the applicant has made a prayer to condone delay of 300 days caused in filing the Revision Application.2. Learned advocate for the parties are absent.3. According to the applicant, earlier the applicant challenged the impugned order by filing an Appeal but the Appeal w...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sangrambhai vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Rule.Learned A.P.P., Mr.H.L. Jani for the respondent no.1-State of Gujarat and learned counsel, Mr.P.M. Lakhani for the respondent no.2-complainant.The present application has been filed by the applicants-accused under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing of the FIR being C.R.No.I...
High Court Of Gujarat
Future vs Mahmad
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the appellant.Admit.ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION Rule returnable on20th July, 2012.Ad-interim relief in terms of para 6(A) on the condition that decretal amount of the judgment and award impugned in this appeal be deposited before the Tribunal within four weeks from today.[A...
High Court Of Gujarat
Laxmiben vs Oriental
Judges:
22 June, 2012·In present petition the petitioner desired compassionate appointment and now in view of change in policy he is praying for compensation in lieu of compassionate appointment.On prima facie consideration of the petition it appears that the subject matter of the petition is related to "service matters"...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rule Not Recd Back For ... vs 3
Judges:
22 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) In this matter, the vires of Section 99(1) of Gujarat Municipality Act has been challenged. Therefore, office is directed to place the matter having jurisdiction to hear the matter where vires of provisions can be challenged, after obtaining necessary nomina...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lakshamanbhai vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·Shri Deval, learned advocate for Shri Bhatt, learned advocate for applicant requests for time. Request is not objected. S.O. to 13.07.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahesh vs State
Judges:
22 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict seeking extension of temporary bail mainly on two grounds; (1) He wants to see that his sister, who is recently got divorced, is remarried and (2) He is also able to attend his ailing mother, who is sufferi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nilkeshkumar vs Sub
Judges:
22 June, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Arpit Kapadia, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Alkesh N. Shah, learned AGP for the respondents.2. The petition is taken out by the petitioner, seeking below mentioned relief and direction:"8(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhanuben vs Rajendrabhai
Judges:
22 June, 2012·1 The appellants, original claimants, have filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for enhancement, against the judgment and award dated 31st August, 2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Court No.21, Ahmedabad, in M.A.C. Petition No.146 of 2000, wher...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.