Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Jagrutiben vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|22 June, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. By filing this application, the applicant has made a prayer to condone delay of 300 days caused in filing the Revision Application.
2. Learned advocate for the parties are absent.
3. According to the applicant, earlier the applicant challenged the impugned order by filing an Appeal but the Appeal was not maintainable and, therefore, it was withdrawn with a view to file Revision Application and, therefore, the delay was caused in filing the Revision Application.
4. The averments made in the application are not controverted by filing reply therefore, they are if not challenged. The applicant has shown sufficient ground to condone the delay and, therefore, his application is required to be allowed.
4. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Delay caused in filing Revision Application is condoned.
Rule made absolute.
(Bankim N. Mehta, J.) PIYUSH Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jagrutiben vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2012