Somaji vs Unknown
Judges:
03 July, 2012·NOTICE returnable on 23.07.2012.Direct service is permitted.(R.M.CHHAYA,J.) Girish Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Haresh vs Namrata
Judges:
03 July, 2012·The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 14, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the prayer that the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vadodara, below application Exh. 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Kamal
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties. Civil Application is disposed of with a direction to the office to notify the main matter being Special Civil Application No. 939 of 2009 for hearing in the week commencing from 20.8.2012.(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Devshi vs State
Judges:
03 July, 2012·As per order dated 20.06.2012, leave to amend was granted.Time to carryout the amendment is extended till 04.07.2012.Returnable date is extended till 17.07.2012. Ad-interim relief in terms of paragraph No.8(B) is granted till then. Direct service is permitted.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatiben Dhirendrabhai Parmar vs Pratik
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(PER :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI)1. By way of the present two separate applications, a prayer has been made to recall / modify the order dated 3.7.2012 passed by this Court in Special Criminal Application No.1761 of 2012 by which corpus Vaishali daughter of Dhirendrabhai Parmar was sent to Sisu...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Mr Rakesh Patel
Judges:
03 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The petition could not be entertained in view of availability of alternative remedy and it was fairly conceded that the petition was required to be made under Section 14 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963. Therefore, the petition is dismissed without en...
High Court Of Gujarat
Official vs Radhe
Judges:
03 July, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notices issued to respondents Nos.2 to 12, have been served, but none appears on their behalf, in spite of service of notices. As the said respondents are Secured Creditors, let fresh Notices be issued to respondents Nos.2 to 12, making them returnable on ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Radheshyam vs Dy
Judges:
03 July, 2012·1. Heard Mr. D.H. Sindhi, learned advocate for the petitioner. Learned advocate for the respondent is not present. However, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that he has been informed by the learned advocate for the respondent that he (learned advocate for the respondent) has no obje...
High Court Of Gujarat
O.L.Of vs Unknown
Judges:
03 July, 2012·Pursuant to order dated 11.04.2012, accused no.2- Shri Chandan Kumar Sen is present in person. Mr.V.K. Shah, learned advocate, states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of accused No.2, and shall be filing the Vakalatnama, during the course of the day.It is pointed out by Mr.J.S. ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Vajiben
Judges:
03 July, 2012·In furtherance of the order dated 11.4.2012, from the amount deposited by the Insurance Company, the Tribunal is directed to invest 70% thereof in any Nationalized Bank in the names of the claimants initially for a period of three years with periodical renewal till the appeal is finally decided by t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.