Adani vs M
Judges:
09 July, 2012·Though the endorsement on the Board indicates that notice issued to respondent No.3 has not been received back, either served or unserved, it is stated by Ms.Paurami B.Sheth, learned advocate for the plaintiff, that a Purshis has been filed by the plaintiff to the effect that the packet of notice ha...
High Court Of Gujarat
Narendrasinh vs State
Judges:
09 July, 2012·At the request made by learned advocate Mr. D.P. Kinariwala, that he has instructed to appear in the matter for the opponent, time may be granted and therefore, the matter is send over to 16.07.2012.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J.) Braj.Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hamir vs Ravabhai
Judges:
09 July, 2012·[1] Heard learned advocates for the respective parties. It is jointly submitted by learned advocates for the respective parties that if necessary direction is given to Trial Court to dispose of the Special Civil Suit No.6 of 2009 within stipulated time, then, they do not invite any reasoned order. I...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nikhil vs Dalal
Judges:
09 July, 2012·Considering the averments made in paragraph 2 of the application, in my view, satisfactory explanation is rendered by the applicant to condone delay of 537 days in filing application for restoration. Delay is condoned. Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed. Rule is made absolute with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ifci vs Official
Judges:
09 July, 2012·1. The applicant bank has taken out summons dated 27.1.2010 seeking below mentioned direction:-"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the official liquidator to determine the inter se ratio for the purpose of final distribution between the secured creditors and the workers in a time bound sche...
High Court Of Gujarat
Niruben vs State
Judges:
09 July, 2012·This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 27.01.2012 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) / 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raval vs Nathibai
Judges:
09 July, 2012·Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners.2. In spite of second call, no one appears for respondents.3. On 29.06.2012, this Court passed the following order:"The petitioners are students and are admitted in B.Ed. Course by respondent No.2-College, which is affiliated to respondent No.1-Universi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mansangji vs State
Judges:
09 July, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Virat Popat states that he has instructions to appear for respondent No.2 original complainant and he has also stated that he may be permitted to file his appearance and the affidavit which he is tendering today opposing any such compromise. He has stated that though the affidav...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
09 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) None present for the appellant.Since the notification about placing of the matter is issued only in the evening of Saturday, there are all chances that the advocates may not be aware about the same.In view of the above, the matter is adjourned to 14th Augus...
High Court Of Gujarat
Liladhar vs None For
Judges:
09 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Rule returnable on 30th July 2012, on condition that on or before 16th July 2012 the applicant shall deposit with the registry the sum of Rs.3,000/- which may be awarded as cost to the respondent.(D.H.Waghela, J.) (G.B.Shah, J.) *malek Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.