Sarojben vs Municipal
Judges:
10 July, 2012·1. The applicant by way of this application has come to know that other persons are also virtually affected by the result of the main petition and therefore the applicant prays to join them as party respondent nos. 35 to 38 in the main petition.2. Considering the averments made in the application, a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Navrang vs Commissioner
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Notice returnable on 17th July 2012. Direct service is permitted.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
District vs Sarojben
Judges:
10 July, 2012·In view of the averments made in the applications, the same are granted in terms of para 6(B). The application stands disposed of accordingly. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hajaribhai vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)1. The present application is filed by the convict through jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 90 days so as to complete the construction work of his house.2. Learned APP Mr. H. K. Patel invited attention of this Court to jail remarks. In the mont...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajugiri vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·The applicant has made this application for seeking furlough leave, but the jail remarks indicate that for 653 days he has absconded and was required to be nabbed and committed to custody, when he was granted furlough leave on earlier occasion. He has been committed to custody only on 13.05.2010 and...
High Court Of Gujarat
Fulsinh vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·The applicant - prisoner has taken out this application for parole leave for carrying out cultivation in his firm. The jail remarks-sheet indicate that on earlier occasion, the applicant - prisoner had over stayed for a period of 2,018 days.This tendency dissuades the Court for not entertaining the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shailesh vs Blue
Judges:
10 July, 2012·This Civil Application is filed for fixing early date of hearing of the main matter i.e. S.C.A. No. 7851 of 2008 on the ground that the applicant is a senior citizen and awaiting final outcome of the litigation, even otherwise also, the matter is of 2008 and it deserve to be fixed for hearing, there...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arbudanagar vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·RULE.Expedited.Mr.Soni, learned AGP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 1 and Mr. Panchal, learned counsel waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 2.Status quo shall be maintained by both the parties.Direct Service to respondent no. 3 is permitted.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalgun...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kantilal vs Banaskantha
Judges:
10 July, 2012·Heard Mr.Mukesh H. Rathod, learned advocate for the petitioner.Issue Notice, returnable on 31.07.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shaileshbhai vs State
Judges:
10 July, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) Learned advocate Mr.P.B.Barot for the petitioner does not press this application and wants to wait till half of the sentence is over.The application is accordingly disposed of.(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (ashish) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.