Indian vs Official
Judges:
16 January, 2012·1. Heard Mr. Bhatt, learned Senior Counsel with Mrs. Bhatt, learned Advocate for the applicant who has taken out present application seeking clarifications and amendment in the order dated 20th October 2011. I have also heard Mr. Gandhi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.2. The applica...
High Court Of Gujarat
M vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·It is reported that the respondent no.11 has expired. Learned Counsel Mr.Shalin Mehta with learned advocate Ms.V.J.Bhatt for the petitioners seek time to delete respondent no.11. Permission is granted. Respondent no.11 stands deleted.Considering the issue involved in the petition, respondent nos. 1 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jitendrasinh vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) The present application is for suspension of sentence and regular bail.Mr.Barot, learned counsel for the applicant does not press the present application with a view to move the Court for early hearing after some time.Disposed of as not pressed.(JAYANT PATE...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Ramrajsinh
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 3[B] and [C]. The application stands disposed of accordingly.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surekhaben vs Sureshkumar
Judges:
16 January, 2012·In spite of earlier order, no action is taken, till date. Hence, the appeal stands DISMISSED for default. Rule is discharged.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) Umesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Krushnadevsinh vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner relying upon the decision in case of Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr. Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors, reported in 2011 STPL (Web) 685 SC, contended that the candidate examinee has right to have his answer books inspected by himself and he confines this p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitaben vs Commissioner
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Learned counsel Mr.Manoj Shrimali, appearing with learned senior advocate Mr.Girish Patel, submitted that since so many years they are not in receipt of any instructions from the petitioner and hence they are unable to proceed with the hearing of the matter. Therefore, petition is dismissed and Rule...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sharadkumar vs State
Judges:
16 January, 2012·1. The present Criminal Misc.Application u/s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicants herein - original accused to quash and set aside the charge-sheet No.112 of 2001 arising out of FIR being C.R.No.I-662 of 2000 registered with Satellite Police Station, Ahmedabad a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Parents vs Union
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Mr.A.J.Yagnik, learned advocate for the petitioner-Association, states that as the present petition is filed in a representative capacity the petitioner-Association would like to approach before Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice for mentioning of the matter. According to the learned advocate for the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Nos.1 - 2
Judges:
16 January, 2012·Neither the name of the respondent nor their advocate is shown on the cause list. Therefore, no one could possibly appear for the respondents today. Hence adjourned. The office is required to see that name of the respondent and their advocates are properly shown on the cause list on the next date of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.